That would be a scalene triangle.
That is the definition of a triangle. If it did not have three sides it would not be a triangle. If it did not have three angles, it would not be a triangle.
It depends on what kind of triangle. A scalene triangle (no equal sides or angles) would not have any lines of symmetry. An isosceles triangle would have 1 line of symmetry, and an equilateral triangle would have 3 lines of symmetry.
That would be an equilateral triangle.
If the area was 0, there would be no triangle.
It would require 36 degrees.
I have a painting called Silver Reflections by Peter Ellenshaw I would like to know it value.
The future tense for "carry" would be like "carrying"like if you say I'm going too be carrying a package.. isn't that future tense?!?There is also "carry" itself, like in the sentence 'I am going to carry the package'
a right triangle
The contrapositive would be: If it is not an isosceles triangle then it is not an equilateral triangle.
That would be a scalene triangle.
It would be called the midsegment of the triangle. And when you have all the midpoints of the triangle joined, you would get the midsegment triangle. It is one fourth of the area of the actual triangle
That is the definition of a triangle. If it did not have three sides it would not be a triangle. If it did not have three angles, it would not be a triangle.
would for a right triangle to have the same magnitude
It would be an obtuse triangle.
It would help to answer the question if there was any information about the shape itself: a triangle, a parallelogram, ... Clearly, that was too much to expect.
Lol