In mathematics, given a subset S of a totally or partially ordered set T, the supremum (sup) of S, if it exists, is the least element of T which is greater than or equal to any element of S. Consequently, the supremum is also referred to as the least upper bound (lub or LUB). If the supremum exists, it is unique. If S contains a greatest element, then that element is the supremum; otherwise, the supremum does not belong to S (or does not exist). For instance, the negative real numbers do not have a greatest element, and their supremum is 0 (which is not a negative real number).
Suprema are often considered for subsets of real numbers, rational numbers, or any other well-known mathematical structure for which it is immediately clear what it means for an element to be "greater-than-or-equal-to" another element. The definition generalizes easily to the more abstract setting of order theory, where one considers arbitrary partially ordered sets.
The concept of supremum coincides with the concept of least upper bound, but not with the concepts of minimal upper bound, maximal element, or greatest element. The supremum is in a precise sense dual to the concept of an infimum.
add me moshi monsters elydingle1
It belongs to the rational numbers which is a subset of the real numbers. The reals, in turn, is a subset of complex numbers.
You have it backwards. Integers are a subset of real numbers.
The real numbers, themselves. Every set is a subset of itself.
Starting at the top, we have the real numbers. The rational numbers is a subset of the reals. So are the irrational numbers. Now some rationals are integers so that is a subset of the rationals. Then a subset of the integers is the whole numbers. The natural numbers is a subset of those.
The natural numbers (ℕ) are a subset of the integers (ℤ) which are a subset of the rational numbers (ℚ) which are a subset of the real numbers (ℝ): ℕ ⊂ ℤ ⊂ ℚ ⊂ ℝ → ℕ ⊂ ℝ and ℤ ⊂ ℝ as well as ℚ ⊂ ℝ
Irrational Numbers which are a subset of Real Numbers which are a subset of Complex Numbers ...
It belongs to the rational numbers which is a subset of the real numbers. The reals, in turn, is a subset of complex numbers.
Rational (β) which is a subset of Real (β) which is a subset of Complex (β).
5
I'm just telling you this ahead of time...but i'm not 100% sure with this answer..: fractions belong in the Rational Numbers
No because natural numbers are a subset of real numbers
You have it backwards. Integers are a subset of real numbers.
Integers are a subset of rational numbers which are a subset of real numbers which are a subset of complex numbers ...
The real numbers, themselves. Every set is a subset of itself.
Imaginary numbers are not a subset of the real numbers; imaginary means not real.
Starting at the top, we have the real numbers. The rational numbers is a subset of the reals. So are the irrational numbers. Now some rationals are integers so that is a subset of the rationals. Then a subset of the integers is the whole numbers. The natural numbers is a subset of those.
The set of Rational Numbers is a [proper] subset of Real Numbers.