1/5
0.002 as a fraction in its lowest terms is 1/500
fraction of decimal 0.55 = 11/200.55 = 0.55 * 100/100 = 55/100 or 11/20 in fraction in lowest term
equivalent fraction for the decimal 0.60 = 3/5 0.6 * 10/10 = 6/10 or 3/5 in fraction in lowest term
I am not sure whether the term "incommensurable" is appropriate here; the official term is "irrational", which means it can't be expressed exactly as a ratio: you can't write a fraction with integer numerator and denominator which is exactlyequal to the square root of 5 (or of any other integer that is not a perfect square) - but you can obviously get very close to the exact value with such a fraction. If you write the square root of 5 as a decimal, you will get an infinite amount of decimal digits, which will not repeat.I am not sure whether the term "incommensurable" is appropriate here; the official term is "irrational", which means it can't be expressed exactly as a ratio: you can't write a fraction with integer numerator and denominator which is exactlyequal to the square root of 5 (or of any other integer that is not a perfect square) - but you can obviously get very close to the exact value with such a fraction. If you write the square root of 5 as a decimal, you will get an infinite amount of decimal digits, which will not repeat.I am not sure whether the term "incommensurable" is appropriate here; the official term is "irrational", which means it can't be expressed exactly as a ratio: you can't write a fraction with integer numerator and denominator which is exactlyequal to the square root of 5 (or of any other integer that is not a perfect square) - but you can obviously get very close to the exact value with such a fraction. If you write the square root of 5 as a decimal, you will get an infinite amount of decimal digits, which will not repeat.I am not sure whether the term "incommensurable" is appropriate here; the official term is "irrational", which means it can't be expressed exactly as a ratio: you can't write a fraction with integer numerator and denominator which is exactlyequal to the square root of 5 (or of any other integer that is not a perfect square) - but you can obviously get very close to the exact value with such a fraction. If you write the square root of 5 as a decimal, you will get an infinite amount of decimal digits, which will not repeat.
An integer
1/5
0.002 as a fraction in its lowest terms is 1/500
fraction of decimal 0.55 = 11/200.55 = 0.55 * 100/100 = 55/100 or 11/20 in fraction in lowest term
equivalent fraction for the decimal 0.60 = 3/5 0.6 * 10/10 = 6/10 or 3/5 in fraction in lowest term
I am not sure whether the term "incommensurable" is appropriate here; the official term is "irrational", which means it can't be expressed exactly as a ratio: you can't write a fraction with integer numerator and denominator which is exactlyequal to the square root of 5 (or of any other integer that is not a perfect square) - but you can obviously get very close to the exact value with such a fraction. If you write the square root of 5 as a decimal, you will get an infinite amount of decimal digits, which will not repeat.I am not sure whether the term "incommensurable" is appropriate here; the official term is "irrational", which means it can't be expressed exactly as a ratio: you can't write a fraction with integer numerator and denominator which is exactlyequal to the square root of 5 (or of any other integer that is not a perfect square) - but you can obviously get very close to the exact value with such a fraction. If you write the square root of 5 as a decimal, you will get an infinite amount of decimal digits, which will not repeat.I am not sure whether the term "incommensurable" is appropriate here; the official term is "irrational", which means it can't be expressed exactly as a ratio: you can't write a fraction with integer numerator and denominator which is exactlyequal to the square root of 5 (or of any other integer that is not a perfect square) - but you can obviously get very close to the exact value with such a fraction. If you write the square root of 5 as a decimal, you will get an infinite amount of decimal digits, which will not repeat.I am not sure whether the term "incommensurable" is appropriate here; the official term is "irrational", which means it can't be expressed exactly as a ratio: you can't write a fraction with integer numerator and denominator which is exactlyequal to the square root of 5 (or of any other integer that is not a perfect square) - but you can obviously get very close to the exact value with such a fraction. If you write the square root of 5 as a decimal, you will get an infinite amount of decimal digits, which will not repeat.
CONVERTING DECIMAL TO FRACTION Example: Change 12.2 to fraction 1. Make 12.2 into a whole number. In this case, multiply 12.2 by 10. 2. Whatever is multiplied to 12.2 should also be divided to it so as not to change the value of 12.2. Therefore: 12.2 * 10/10 = 122/10 or 61/5 in fraction in lowest term
0.07 is a fraction. It is a fraction in decimal form rather than in the form of a ratio. However, that does not stop it being a fraction. And, since it is a decimal fraction, there is not another simpler decimal form. Its equivalent, in rational form, is 7/100 which cannot be simplified.
write 12/25 as a decimal number
81/25032.4%= 0.324 in decimal= 324/1000 or 81/250 in fraction
3/200.15 * 100/100 = 15/100 or 3/20 in fraction in lowest term
To convert a decimal into a fraction, place .4875 over 1 in fraction for (.4875/1). Then add as many zeroes to the right of the lower number as there are numbers to the right of the decimal and remove the decimal (4875/10000). Then reduce the fraction to its lowest term (39/80).