The answer is no, if a rectangle's sides were congruent, it would be a square not a rectangle.
All four sides of a square have the same length. This is an additional condition, additionally to the conditions that make a rectangle a rectangle.
No. A square is a rectangle, but a rectangle is not a square.
That would be a rhombus. (It can't be a 'square', because a square is also a rectangle.)
A square is a special rectangle.
Shorten its length to the same size as its width.
a rectangle doesn't have four equal sided measurements, which is the definition of a square. also it can take one or more squares to make a rectangle but u can't make a rectangle into a square.
a rectangle doesn't have four equal sided measurements, which is the definition of a square. also it can take one or more squares to make a rectangle but u can't make a rectangle into a square.
rectangle
yes, because if you cut the rectangle in half it would make 2 squares
No.
A rectangle by definition has four right angles, so it cannot be equilateral. An equilateral shape has all sides of equal length, which would make it a square or rhombus, but not a rectangle.
The two triangles would make either a square or a rectangle.
The answer is no, if a rectangle's sides were congruent, it would be a square not a rectangle.
the polygon would be a square
All four sides of a square have the same length. This is an additional condition, additionally to the conditions that make a rectangle a rectangle.
A square is a rectangle even through a rectangle is not always a square.