Only right triangles have right angles. An equilateral triangle though can't have a right angle because all the angles in any type of triangle must add up to 180 degrees. For each angle to be equilateral, they must be 60 degrees, showing that there is no angle at 90 degrees in an equilateral triangle, which would signify that it would be right.
That depends whether the 47 degrees is an internal angle or not. Internally, the minimum angle for a regular polygon would be 60 degrees - as in an equilateral triangle.
Well, in an equilateral triangle, all three angles have to be equal. Plus, the sum of all the angles must be 180. Therefore, if you want to find on angle of an equilateral triangle, you would use the equation, 180/3=60
45 degrees, which would be the interior angle of a equilateral triangle
No-An equilateral triangle has equal angles, an obtuse angle is greater than 90. So, an equilateral triangle with an obtuse angle would have the three angles add up to a MINIMUM of 270.0000000000001, and a triangle's angles must add up to 180°.
Only right triangles have right angles. An equilateral triangle though can't have a right angle because all the angles in any type of triangle must add up to 180 degrees. For each angle to be equilateral, they must be 60 degrees, showing that there is no angle at 90 degrees in an equilateral triangle, which would signify that it would be right.
That depends whether the 47 degrees is an internal angle or not. Internally, the minimum angle for a regular polygon would be 60 degrees - as in an equilateral triangle.
No, because then it would become an equilateral triangle.
An equilateral triangle would fit the given description
Well, in an equilateral triangle, all three angles have to be equal. Plus, the sum of all the angles must be 180. Therefore, if you want to find on angle of an equilateral triangle, you would use the equation, 180/3=60
45 degrees, which would be the interior angle of a equilateral triangle
Equilateral triangle...each angle would be of 60degrees
No-An equilateral triangle has equal angles, an obtuse angle is greater than 90. So, an equilateral triangle with an obtuse angle would have the three angles add up to a MINIMUM of 270.0000000000001, and a triangle's angles must add up to 180°.
An equilateral triangle has 3 equal angles of 60 degrees that add up to 180 degrees and trisecting a 60 degree angle equally would give 3 equal 20 degree angles.
No, that's not possible. Consider these facts: -- all three angles of any triangle always add up to 180 degrees -- all three angles in an equilateral triangle have to be the same size -- a right triangle has a right angle in it; a right angle is 90 degrees An equilateral right triangle would need three right angles in it, and they would add up to 270 degrees. As we said earlier: Impossible.
Yes. In this case, the isosceles triangle would more specifically be an equilateral triangle - this can be considered a special case of an isosceles triangle.
No, never. There's more than one way to get at it: -- The angles of an equilateral triangle are all equal. Since the interior angles of any triangle always add up to 180 degrees, the angles of an equilateral triangle are each 60 degrees. There's no right angle. -- A right triangle is a triangle with an interior right angle. An equilateral triangle has three equal angles. If it were a right triangle, each angle would be a right angle. Then: -- the three interior angles would add up to 270 degrees, which is impossible in a triangle; and -- two sides would be parallel to each other, they would never meet, and there could be no triangle. -- The sides of a right triangle satisfy the Pythagorean equation: A2 + B2 = C2. If all three sides were equal, then you'd have (two times the square of a number) equal to (the square of the same number), which isn't possible. -- Remember that the 'hypotenuse' of a right triangle is the longest side. But an equilateral triangle can't have a 'longest' side.NOA right triangle always has a 90 degree angle and an equilateral triangle always has three 60 degree angles, so no.