A smaller cell has a higher surface area to volume ratio.
A reason for this is volume is cubic (3D) and surface area is 2D so when surface area increases a little bit, the volume increases exponentially. And when the surface area shrinks a little bit, the volume decreases exponentially.
A planet with a greater mass does not necessarily have greater surface area than one with less mass. The planet could be made of denser material and have a smaller surface area. Mass doesn't always mean volume.
No. Relative to its volume, the greater the number of sides, the smaller the volume. In the limit, a cylinder (circular prism, with an infinite number of "sides") will have the least surface area.
Reactions proceed at the surface. The smaller the particle, the greater the surface to volume ratio, the more rapid the reaction proceeds. A practical example: Powdered candy dissolves faster than a lump of candy.
It can be.
The surface area to volume ratio decreases - assuming the shape remains similar.
they have a greater surface-to-volume ratio
Density = Mass/Volume, whatever the shape. So, if the masses are the same, the density is greater when the volume id smaller. Thus the sphere, with the smaller volume has the greater density.
In their motion to the surface air bubbles are associated and the volume increase.
27 smaller cells would have a greater surface area than one large cell. This is because the total surface area of the smaller cells would be greater due to the additional surface area of the cell membranes around each individual cell.
Capillaries are tiny blood vessels. They need to have a greater surface area to volume ratio because they need to diffuse oxygen quicker.
No. The surface to volume ratio of a sphere is always smaller than that of a cube. This is because the sphere has the smallest surface area compared to its volume, while the cube has the largest surface area compared to its volume.
A planet with a greater mass does not necessarily have greater surface area than one with less mass. The planet could be made of denser material and have a smaller surface area. Mass doesn't always mean volume.
greater surface area to volume ratio greater the rate of dissolution it will dissolve faster if broken into smaller pieces hence smaller = faster
The relationship between surface area, volume, and body size in animals is that as an animal's body size increases, its volume increases faster than its surface area. This means that larger animals have a smaller surface area relative to their volume compared to smaller animals. This has implications for things like heat regulation, as larger animals may have a harder time dissipating heat due to their smaller surface area relative to their volume.
No. Relative to its volume, the greater the number of sides, the smaller the volume. In the limit, a cylinder (circular prism, with an infinite number of "sides") will have the least surface area.
The Arctic fox has a smaller surface area to volume ratio to minimize heat loss in its cold environment. A smaller ratio means less surface area through which heat can escape. In comparison, the British fox has a larger ratio to help dissipate heat in its more temperate climate.
A smaller cell with a 2cm diameter would have a greater surface area to volume ratio compared to a larger cell with a 5cm diameter. This means that the smaller cell can more efficiently exchange nutrients and waste with its environment, making it more likely to survive. Additionally, smaller cells may have a lower energy requirement, which can increase their chances of survival in adverse conditions.