The geometric mean, if it exists, is always less than or equal to the arithmetic mean. The two are equal only if all the numbers are the same.
Look 2 and 8, their geometric mean is square root of 16 which is 4 and between 2 and 54. 9 and 4 have a geometric mean of 6 which is also between 2 and 54. Is this what you mean? Pun intended... The geometric mean of 2 and 54 is square root of 108.
54
54, 54, 54, 54, 54, 54, 54, 54, 54, 84 The median is clearly 54. The mean is ((54*9)+84)/10 = 57.
-54: The Security Of The Believer.
Even numbers. A geometric progression where each number is three times the previous number.
The geometric mean of 18 and 54 is 31.176914
Look 2 and 8, their geometric mean is square root of 16 which is 4 and between 2 and 54. 9 and 4 have a geometric mean of 6 which is also between 2 and 54. Is this what you mean? Pun intended... The geometric mean of 2 and 54 is square root of 108.
18
Arithmetic, you ADD the same number each time, eg. 2, 5, 8, 11 etc. Geometric, you MULTIPLY by the same number each time, eg. 2, 6, 18, 54 etc.
It is neither. (-6) - (-2) = -4 (-18) - (-6) = -12 which is not the same as -4. Therefore it is not an arithmetic progression - which requires the difference between successive terms to be the same. Also -162/-54 = 3 -468/-162 = 2.88... recurring, and that is not the same as 3. Therefore it is not a geometric progression - which requires the ratio of terms to be the same.
If you mean 6, 18, 54 then the 6th term is 1456 because each term is 3 times greater than the previous term
This is not a geometric series since -18/54 is not the same as -36/12
66 is greater than 54.
GM(6, 9) = sqrt(6*9) = sqrt(54) = 7.3485 approx.
652 is greater than 54.
54
Yes, 56 is greater than 54.