answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

less than 100 years ago Dalton published his theory that atoms could not be broken down into smaller particles. Scientist have found out that they can in fact be broken down even further.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

Dalton thought that atoms could not be subdivided. Today we know that all of the subatomic particles can and do exist separately.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Which of Daltons statements about the atom was later proven false?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Math & Arithmetic

How do you make a test conjecture with the product of two odd integers?

One possible conjecture is that the product of two odd integers is 8. A conjecture does not have to be true, nor does it have to be sensible. It must be testable, though. Many conjectures were initially thought to be sensible and true but later proven to be false. And when the false nature is fully understood, in retrospect they no longer appear sensible either!


Is mathematics based on assumptions?

In a way, yes. Certain "postulates" or "axioms" are assumed to be true; all other statements are derived from those. The "postulates" are chosen so that they are reasonable and simple assumptions.If you try to prove the postulates, you have to derive them from some other statements, so sooner or later, you will always have unproved statements. That can't be avoided.In a way, yes. Certain "postulates" or "axioms" are assumed to be true; all other statements are derived from those. The "postulates" are chosen so that they are reasonable and simple assumptions.If you try to prove the postulates, you have to derive them from some other statements, so sooner or later, you will always have unproved statements. That can't be avoided.In a way, yes. Certain "postulates" or "axioms" are assumed to be true; all other statements are derived from those. The "postulates" are chosen so that they are reasonable and simple assumptions.If you try to prove the postulates, you have to derive them from some other statements, so sooner or later, you will always have unproved statements. That can't be avoided.In a way, yes. Certain "postulates" or "axioms" are assumed to be true; all other statements are derived from those. The "postulates" are chosen so that they are reasonable and simple assumptions.If you try to prove the postulates, you have to derive them from some other statements, so sooner or later, you will always have unproved statements. That can't be avoided.


Does the bible have statements of truth which people made but are not truth?

This question is unanswerable. How can a "statement of truth" be made which "is not true". Truth does not change. It cannot be that something was true when it was said and later it became untrue.


True or False erosion control first becomes important at the first evidence of erosion?

False. Erosion control should begin before the first evidence of erosion. When building bridges over waterways, construction contractors are already devising ways to control erosion so the bridge does not fall into the water later on.


Is the sentence right you will come to work half hour later and leave half hour later as well?

my flight will come an hour later

Related questions

Do black mambas exist in the US?

No, this is mainly due to habitat. However, rumors have been passed round that some have been sited, these were later proven false.


Although the Greeks thought some constructions impossible all of the so called impossible problems were later proven to be possible in the 18th and 19th centuries?

This statement is false. Although the Greeks thought some constructions impossible, not all of the so called impossible problems were later proven to be possible.


What is langley's law?

Langley's law is it takes less energy to fly once you gain momentum. He based this on a skipping rock or a skater skating on thin ice. It was later proven to be false.


Many of the constructions which the Greeks thought impossible were later proven impossible in the 18th and 19th centuries?

Yes, many were later proven to be impossible.


True of false If you are not allergic to something now you will never be allergic to it later in life?

This is false. Allergies can spring up later in life.


True of false If you are not allergeic to something now you will never be allergic to it later in life?

False


Why did they think there was a end to the earth back then?

From perspective on ground, land (more specifically ocean) was flat, and went on and on, until you fell off the side. This was later proven false, as with airplanes. As you travel up, you start to see more spherical shaping occur.


How do you make a test conjecture with the product of two odd integers?

One possible conjecture is that the product of two odd integers is 8. A conjecture does not have to be true, nor does it have to be sensible. It must be testable, though. Many conjectures were initially thought to be sensible and true but later proven to be false. And when the false nature is fully understood, in retrospect they no longer appear sensible either!


Although the Greeks thought some constructions impossible all of the so-called impossible problems were later proven to be possible in the 18th and 19th centuries?

No. They were not proven to be possible.


Do high tides occur later in the west true or false?

Yes


Is mathematics based on assumptions?

In a way, yes. Certain "postulates" or "axioms" are assumed to be true; all other statements are derived from those. The "postulates" are chosen so that they are reasonable and simple assumptions.If you try to prove the postulates, you have to derive them from some other statements, so sooner or later, you will always have unproved statements. That can't be avoided.In a way, yes. Certain "postulates" or "axioms" are assumed to be true; all other statements are derived from those. The "postulates" are chosen so that they are reasonable and simple assumptions.If you try to prove the postulates, you have to derive them from some other statements, so sooner or later, you will always have unproved statements. That can't be avoided.In a way, yes. Certain "postulates" or "axioms" are assumed to be true; all other statements are derived from those. The "postulates" are chosen so that they are reasonable and simple assumptions.If you try to prove the postulates, you have to derive them from some other statements, so sooner or later, you will always have unproved statements. That can't be avoided.In a way, yes. Certain "postulates" or "axioms" are assumed to be true; all other statements are derived from those. The "postulates" are chosen so that they are reasonable and simple assumptions.If you try to prove the postulates, you have to derive them from some other statements, so sooner or later, you will always have unproved statements. That can't be avoided.


What happens if they executed the suspect and then they are later proven innocent is it considered murder?

im not sure but i think yeah!