Yes, if they are pointing in opposite directions (separated by 180°).
The opposite of zero - in the sense of additive inverse - is zero.
An additive opposite, yes. A multiplicative one, no.
fragmentation
No.
There is not much to prove there; opposite numbers, by which I take you mean "additive inverse", are defined so that their sum equals zero.
Yes, if they are pointing in opposite directions (separated by 180°).
Zero is it's own opposite
The opposite of zero - in the sense of additive inverse - is zero.
An additive inverse is whatever will combine to make zero, in this case, -6.
zero has no opposite * * * * * While it is true that zero has no multiplicative opposite (or inverse), it certainly has an additive inverse, and that is also zero, since 0 + 0 = 0
Zero does not have an opposite * * * * * While it is true that zero has no multiplicative opposite (or inverse), it certainly has an additive inverse, and that is also zero, since 0 + 0 = 0
Sometimes. The opposite of zero depends on the type of function under consideration. For example, the additive opposite of zero is zero. The multiplicative opposite is not defined.
The additive opposite is itself and its multiplicative opposite is not defined.
No. 3/4x4/3 is 1. 4 divided by 4 is 1; 3 divided by 3 is 3. If it was zero, 3/4x4/3x5=0. It isn't zero, it's five. And, the opposite is called a reciprocal.
A number and its opposite,which add to zero.
Zero has no multiplicative opposite (or inverse). However, it has an additive inverse, and that is also zero, since 0 + 0 = 0 The opposite value of a null set would be an infinite set, but infinity is not a real number. The opposite of zero in binary coding is one (on vs. off).