It's a positive, 5-place decimal number, and it's a rational number. Its value is 0.001% less than 1/3 .
5 is a natural number, as it is an integer greater than zero. It is a whole number, an integer, and a rational number.
-13 is an odd number which is less than 5.
Yes, -5 is a rational number
5 = 5/1 is a rational number
-- Every whole number that's less than 5 is a rational number less than 5. -- Every terminating decimal that's less than 5, and some that don't terminate, is a rational number less than 5. -- Every number less than 5 that you can completely write with digits is a rational number less than 5.
Here, the given rational number is 5 and it is also a whole number. It can also be expressed in fraction form as 5/1. We can determine all the whole numbers less than 5 as a rational number. Hence, 1, 2, 3, and 4 are the rational numbers less than 5.
Some examples: 0, 3/5, -6, 0.23, -5
number line. Writing numbers on a number line makes it easy to see which numbers are greater or less. Negative numbers (−) Positive numbers (+) (The line goes right and left forever.) The number on the left is less than the number on the right. Examples: 5 less than 8; 5 less than 8; 5 is less than 8; 5 is less than 8; 5
It's a positive, 5-place decimal number, and it's a rational number. Its value is 0.001% less than 1/3 .
Let x = the number Difference: 5 is less than a number: 5 < x 5 less than a number: x - 5 1234
5 is a natural number, as it is an integer greater than zero. It is a whole number, an integer, and a rational number.
It's the ratio of 5 and 1 ... a rational number.
Answer: NO Explanation: Let's look at an example to see how this works. A is all rational numbers less than 5. So one element of A might be 1 since that is less than 5 or 1/2, or -1/2, or even 0. Now if we pick 1/2 or 0, clearly that numbers that are greater than them in the set. So what we are really asking, is there a largest rational number less than 5. In a set A, we define the define the supremum to be the smallest real number that is greater than or equal to every number in A. So do rationals have a supremum? That is really the heart of the question. Now that you understand that, let's state an important finding in math: If an ordered set A has the property that every nonempty subset of A having an upper bound also has a least upper bound, then A is said to have the least-upper-bound property In this case if we pick any number very close to 5, we can find another number even closer because the rational numbers are dense in the real numbers. So the conclusion is that the rational number DO NOT have the least upper bound property. This means there is no number q that fulfills your criteria.
-13 is an odd number which is less than 5.
because every integer is a rational number
Yes, -5 is a rational number