5 is rational. Rational numbers are numbers that can be written as a fraction. Irrational numbers cannot be expressed as a fraction.
By 5 out of 13 I assume you mean 5/13 and if so than it is rational because irrational numbers cannot be written as fractions.
There are no numbers that are more than 5 but less than 3. 3 is less than 5, so anything that is less than 3 is also less than 5.
Prime numbers less than 10 = 2, 3, 5, 7The sum of prime numbers less than 10:= 2 + 3 + 5 + 7= 17
Every rational number does.
Here, the given rational number is 5 and it is also a whole number. It can also be expressed in fraction form as 5/1. We can determine all the whole numbers less than 5 as a rational number. Hence, 1, 2, 3, and 4 are the rational numbers less than 5.
I think so. -4 and -5 are both rational numbers. Their sum is -9, which is less than both of them individually.
Prime and odd numbers
number line. Writing numbers on a number line makes it easy to see which numbers are greater or less. Negative numbers (−) Positive numbers (+) (The line goes right and left forever.) The number on the left is less than the number on the right. Examples: 5 less than 8; 5 less than 8; 5 is less than 8; 5 is less than 8; 5
5 is rational. Rational numbers are numbers that can be written as a fraction. Irrational numbers cannot be expressed as a fraction.
5 is rational. Rational numbers are numbers that can be written as a fraction. Irrational numbers cannot be expressed as a fraction.
Infinitely many. In fact, there are more irrational numbers between them than there are rational numbers.Infinitely many. In fact, there are more irrational numbers between them than there are rational numbers.Infinitely many. In fact, there are more irrational numbers between them than there are rational numbers.Infinitely many. In fact, there are more irrational numbers between them than there are rational numbers.
- sqrt(26)
5/11 is rational. Rational numbers are numbers that can be written as a fraction. Irrational numbers cannot be expressed as a fraction.
Answer: NO Explanation: Let's look at an example to see how this works. A is all rational numbers less than 5. So one element of A might be 1 since that is less than 5 or 1/2, or -1/2, or even 0. Now if we pick 1/2 or 0, clearly that numbers that are greater than them in the set. So what we are really asking, is there a largest rational number less than 5. In a set A, we define the define the supremum to be the smallest real number that is greater than or equal to every number in A. So do rationals have a supremum? That is really the heart of the question. Now that you understand that, let's state an important finding in math: If an ordered set A has the property that every nonempty subset of A having an upper bound also has a least upper bound, then A is said to have the least-upper-bound property In this case if we pick any number very close to 5, we can find another number even closer because the rational numbers are dense in the real numbers. So the conclusion is that the rational number DO NOT have the least upper bound property. This means there is no number q that fulfills your criteria.
In their rational form, the denominators have factors other than 2 and 5.
By 5 out of 13 I assume you mean 5/13 and if so than it is rational because irrational numbers cannot be written as fractions.