Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
if a language is recognized by NFA then it can also be recognized by DFA so we can simply say that NFA=DFA
DFA - deterministic finite automata NFA - non-deterministic finite automata
DFA - Deterministic Finite Automata NFA - Non-Deterministic Finite Automata Both DFAs and NFAs are abstract machines which can be used to describe languages.
aop
Branches in the ICS organization may be
Mr. Jessup P. Navarro is the current Administrator of the Philippine National Food Authority (NFA). However, since the NFA is under the Department of Agriculture (DA), the Secretary of DA, Sec. Arthur C. Yap, chairs the NFA Council.
in 1965 the NFA joined with FFA
Be more specific about what NFA you are talking about!
if a language is recognized by NFA then it can also be recognized by DFA so we can simply say that NFA=DFA
in 1965 the NFA joined with FFA
Yes, a Deterministic Finite Automaton (DFA) can simulate a Non-deterministic Finite Automaton (NFA). This can be achieved by constructing an equivalent DFA for a given NFA using the subset construction method. In this method, each state of the DFA represents a set of states of the NFA, and transitions are defined based on the transitions of the NFA. By following this approach, a DFA can effectively simulate the behavior of an NFA.
To convert regular grammar into a nondeterministic finite automaton (NFA), each production rule in the grammar is represented as a transition in the NFA. The start symbol of the grammar becomes the start state of the NFA, and the accepting states of the NFA correspond to the final states of the grammar. The NFA can then recognize strings that are generated by the regular grammar.
in 1965 the NFA joined with FFA
in 1965 the NFA joined with FFA
in 1965 the NFA joined with FFA
To convert regular expressions to NFA (Nondeterministic Finite Automaton), you can use Thompson's construction algorithm. This involves creating a series of NFA fragments based on the components of the regular expression and then combining them to form the final NFA. For example, let's consider the regular expression (ab). Here's how you can convert it to an NFA using Thompson's construction: Create NFA fragments for 'a' and 'b'. Combine the 'a' and 'b' fragments using the union operation to create an NFA fragment for (ab). Create an NFA fragment for the Kleene closure () operation by adding epsilon transitions to allow for zero or more repetitions. Combine the (ab) fragment with the Kleene closure fragment to form the final NFA for (ab). By following these steps and combining the NFA fragments accordingly, you can convert regular expressions to NFA.
To convert an epsilon nfa to a dfa you need to do an intermediate step. We know: Regular expression > epsilon nfa > nfa > DFA We cannot skip steps here. To convert an epsilon nfa to an nfa, first you need to make a transition table for the epsilon nfa. In the transition table, just do not include the epsilons, meaning only transitions to sets of states. Also remember that you can use epsilon transitions, however an input must be consumed as well to move to another state. As well all states that can be reached only by epsilon transitions become final states. After you have the resulting transition table for the nfa, you can now make a dfa. All sets of states that are reachable in the nfa become single states in the dfa.