answersLogoWhite

0


Want this question answered?

Be notified when an answer is posted

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why SJF Shorter response time than FCFS?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

How can a temperature probe with a shorter response time be constructed.?

To construct a temperature probe with a shorter response time, you can use a sensor with a smaller thermal mass, decrease the size of the probe's thermal insulation to allow for quicker heat transfer, and optimize the electronics for faster signal processing. Additionally, ensuring proper calibration and placement of the temperature probe can also help improve response time.


What is a good incidence response time for a burglary?

Reponse time for burglary varies by country, state and even neighbourhood, so there is no universal good response time. Studies have noted that response times tend to be shorter in poorer neighbourhoods in the US, but poorer countries tend to have less policing and longer response times.


What are the benefits of purchasing plasma TV's?

Plasma TVs allow more picture clarity and are cheaper than comparable LCD TVs of the same size. Response time is often shorter than other TVs, and they feature deeper blacks.


What are the disadvantages of FCFS scheduling?

in fcfs scheduling there is a shortcoming that is if any rocess of maximum brust time is first ome. and after that many short burst time process come. then smaller pocesses have to wait for a long time untill the max brust time process complete their execution. in case of shortest job first it applied the method to give shortest t\burst time job to processer first.


What is a time span shorter than an era such as quaternary?

A Period


Explain with an example first come first serve scheduling algorithm?

By far the simplest CPU-scheduling algorithm is the first-come, first-served (FCFS) scheduling algorithm. With this scheme, the process that requests the CPU first is allocated the CPU first. The implementation of the FCFS policy is easily managed with a FIFO queue. When a process enters the ready queue, its PCB is linked onto the tail of the queue. When the CPU is free, it is allocated to the process at the head of the queue. The running process is then removed from the queue. The code for FCFS scheduling is simple to write and understand. The average waiting time under the FCFS policy, however, is often quite long. Consider the following set of processes that arrive at time 0, with the length of the CPU-burst time given in milliseconds:


Shorter than a period on the geologic time scale?

Not even a blip.


What is the term for the length of time it takes your body to respond to a stimulus?

The term is "reaction time." It is the time it takes for your body to process a stimulus and generate a response. A shorter reaction time is often associated with quicker reflexes and coordination.


What is a sub millisecond?

All and any moment of time that's shorter than a millisecond.


What is .78 minutes?

A measure of time, somewhat shorter than 1 minute. Or an angle.


How is shorter recess better than longer recess?

shorter recess is better because you will learn more in school because there will be more learning time.


Briefly define FCFS scheduling?

First-Come, First-Serve (FCFS) scheduling is one of the simplest scheduling algorithms in the realm of operating systems, and its implementation offers a straightforward approach to process management. In FCFS scheduling, processes are executed in the order they arrive in the ready queue, essentially adhering to a first-in, first-out (FIFO) strategy. The fundamental principle behind FCFS is straightforward: the first process to request the CPU gets executed first, and subsequent processes have to wait until the CPU is available again. The mechanism of FCFS scheduling is simple to understand and implement. When a process enters the system, it gets placed in the ready queue. The CPU scheduler picks the process at the head of the queue for execution and allocates the CPU to this process. The process continues to execute until it either finishes or gets blocked for I/O or some other reason, at which point the CPU is allocated to the next process in the ready queue. This cycle continues until all processes are executed. FCFS is non-preemptive, meaning once the CPU is allocated to a process, it retains control of the CPU until it completes its execution or gets blocked for some reason. This characteristic simplifies the scheduler design, making FCFS an attractive choice for simple systems or batch processing environments where jobs are more or less independent of each other. However, FCFS scheduling has its set of drawbacks. It can lead to the "convoy effect," where short processes have to wait for a long process to complete, leading to suboptimal CPU utilization. The average waiting time under FCFS scheduling can be high if long processes arrive at the queue early. Moreover, FCFS does not prioritize processes based on their importance or urgency, which can be a significant limitation in scenarios where certain processes require immediate attention. Despite its limitations, the simplicity and ease of implementation of FCFS scheduling make it a viable choice in specific scenarios, especially in systems with minimal process management requirements or in batch processing environments. It serves as a foundation for understanding more complex scheduling algorithms and provides a clear illustration of how process scheduling works at a basic level. In a nutshell, FCFS scheduling is a fundamental, easy-to-implement scheduling algorithm that executes processes based on their arrival order, adhering to a non-preemptive, first-in, first-out strategy. While it may not be the most efficient or versatile scheduling algorithm, its simplicity makes it a useful stepping stone in the study of operating system scheduling algorithms, paving the way for understanding more advanced scheduling strategies.