no. micro second is less than milli second.
A microsecond, which is 1,000 times smaller than a millisecond. A nanosecond, which is one-millionth of a millisecond (one-billionth of a second). A picosecond, which is one-billionth of a millisecond (one-trillionth of a second). This is also the shortest period of time that is currently accurately measurable.
there was one kind of second. it is called nanoseconds. Usually, it can be seen faster moving than a second in a timer.
1000 is more than 300.
1000 lbs is greater.
A microsecond is 1,000 times smaller than a millisecond. This means that one millisecond is equal to 1,000 microseconds.
NO! A microsecond is one one-thousandth (1/1000) of a millisecond
A microsecond is faster than a millisecond. One microsecond is equal to one millionth of a second, while one millisecond is equal to one thousandth of a second. Therefore, it takes 1000 microseconds to make 1 millisecond.
Microseconds are shorter than milliseconds
Same answer as if you replaced the word "nanoseconds" with the word "years".Let me show you how to do it:What is faster, 210 years or 2 years ?Now can you guess ?
There are 1,000,000,000 nanoseconds in a second. There are 1x60x60x24x365.25 or 31,557,600 seconds in a year. So nanoseconds in a second is over 60 times more
No. There are roughly pi * 10 million seconds in a year, which is around 30 times more than the number of microseconds in a second.
A nanosecond is one billionth of a second, while a microsecond is one millionth of a second. Therefore, a nanosecond is 1,000 times faster than a microsecond.
no. micro second is less than milli second.
Slower than what?
Slower than what?
wrong! The Flash can actually go the speed of light which is 670,000,000 mph and not mach 1000 which was the old answer and just to be clear mach 1000 is 670,000,0 mph.