In a stable ecoystem, there should always be more producers than carnivores. For one, there has to be more energy, because your energy flow has to reach the top of the pyramid through your primary, secondary, etc. consumers. There has to be more at the bottom because the organisms at the upper levels have to have a food source. How would the jungle look if there were 100 tigers and only 1 plant?
In a pyramid structure, such as in economics or population distribution, there are only a few consumers at the top due to factors like resource availability, income inequality, and consumer preferences. The top tier often represents a small percentage of the population that has the means to access premium products or services. Additionally, as you move up the pyramid, the costs or barriers to entry typically increase, limiting access for the majority. This creates a concentration of wealth and consumption at the top.
The pyramid of numbers is not a true pyramid shape because it represents the number of organisms at each trophic level rather than biomass or energy. In many ecosystems, the number of individual organisms can be greater at lower trophic levels while higher levels may contain fewer, larger organisms, leading to an irregular shape. Additionally, some ecosystems, such as those with a few large producers and many small consumers, can result in inverted pyramids. Thus, the pyramid of numbers can be skewed and does not always reflect a true pyramidal structure.
the tang government was like a pyramid. what made up the top three leavels of this pyramid
The term "pyramid of numbers" is derived from the visual representation of the relationship between different trophic levels in an ecosystem. In this graphical representation, the number of organisms at each trophic level is depicted as a pyramid, with the primary producers forming the base and the top predators at the apex. This structure resembles a pyramid due to the decreasing number of organisms at each successive trophic level, reflecting the energy transfer and biomass distribution within the ecosystem.
An ecological pyramid gets smaller towards the top due to the loss of energy at each trophic level, as described by the 10% rule, where only about 10% of the energy from one level is passed on to the next. This energy loss occurs through metabolic processes, heat production, and incomplete consumption of organisms. As a result, fewer organisms can be supported at higher trophic levels, leading to a decrease in biomass and numbers, which creates the characteristic shape of the pyramid.
This is because only about 10% of energy is transferred from one trophic level to the next. The other 90% or so is used up by the organism itself for life processes, digestion, excretion, growth, movement and transpiration for plants. Therefore the amount of energy decrease up the trophic levels and the higher the trophic level, the less the energy received.
There are fewer organisms at the top of a biomass pyramid because energy is lost as it is transferred from one trophic level to the next. This means that less energy is available to support the growth and maintenance of organisms at higher trophic levels, resulting in fewer individuals.
In a stable ecoystem, there should always be more producers than carnivores. For one, there has to be more energy, because your energy flow has to reach the top of the pyramid through your primary, secondary, etc. consumers. There has to be more at the bottom because the organisms at the upper levels have to have a food source. How would the jungle look if there were 100 tigers and only 1 plant?
In a stable ecoystem, there should always be more producers than carnivores. For one, there has to be more energy, because your energy flow has to reach the top of the pyramid through your primary, secondary, etc. consumers. There has to be more at the bottom because the organisms at the upper levels have to have a food source. How would the jungle look if there were 100 tigers and only 1 plant?
In a stable ecoystem, there should always be more producers than carnivores. For one, there has to be more energy, because your energy flow has to reach the top of the pyramid through your primary, secondary, etc. consumers. There has to be more at the bottom because the organisms at the upper levels have to have a food source. How would the jungle look if there were 100 tigers and only 1 plant?
At the top of the energy pyramid are the tertiary consumers or top predators. These are organisms that consume secondary consumers and have no predators of their own in the ecosystem. Examples include large carnivores like lions or sharks.
No, green algae would not be found at the top of an energy pyramid. They are producers that form the base of the pyramid, converting sunlight into energy through photosynthesis. Organisms higher up in the pyramid, like herbivores and carnivores, consume the green algae for energy.
You would find a turkey closer to the top of an energy pyramid, as they are primary consumers that feed on plants or other organisms lower in the food chain.
The energy pyramid shows how the amount of useful energy, food, decreases as organisms in that level use it. Even though a lot of energy may be taken in at any level, more energy in the form of food that is available to the next level, is stored on the bottom level and decreases at each level as you move to the top of the pyramid. Thus, there is much less energy to support organisms at the top, so there are fewer in most communities.
a pyramid of energy shows how organisms get or produce their food
The top of the pyramid was called the capstone.
The flat-top pyramid is called a ziggurat.