In a stable ecoystem, there should always be more producers than carnivores. For one, there has to be more energy, because your energy flow has to reach the top of the pyramid through your primary, secondary, etc. consumers. There has to be more at the bottom because the organisms at the upper levels have to have a food source. How would the jungle look if there were 100 tigers and only 1 plant?
the tang government was like a pyramid. what made up the top three leavels of this pyramid
A square based pyramid has 5 corners - 4 for the square and 1 for the top of the pyramid.
Nothing
yes
the pointy top.
There are few organisms at the top of an energy pyramid because energy is lost as it moves up the food chain through each trophic level. The top predators have less available energy because much of it has been used by the organisms at lower trophic levels for their own metabolism and growth. This limits the number of organisms that can be supported at the top of the energy pyramid.
There are fewer organisms at the top of a biomass pyramid because energy is lost as it is transferred from one trophic level to the next. This means that less energy is available to support the growth and maintenance of organisms at higher trophic levels, resulting in fewer individuals.
In a stable ecoystem, there should always be more producers than carnivores. For one, there has to be more energy, because your energy flow has to reach the top of the pyramid through your primary, secondary, etc. consumers. There has to be more at the bottom because the organisms at the upper levels have to have a food source. How would the jungle look if there were 100 tigers and only 1 plant?
In a stable ecoystem, there should always be more producers than carnivores. For one, there has to be more energy, because your energy flow has to reach the top of the pyramid through your primary, secondary, etc. consumers. There has to be more at the bottom because the organisms at the upper levels have to have a food source. How would the jungle look if there were 100 tigers and only 1 plant?
In a stable ecoystem, there should always be more producers than carnivores. For one, there has to be more energy, because your energy flow has to reach the top of the pyramid through your primary, secondary, etc. consumers. There has to be more at the bottom because the organisms at the upper levels have to have a food source. How would the jungle look if there were 100 tigers and only 1 plant?
At the top of the energy pyramid are the tertiary consumers or top predators. These are organisms that consume secondary consumers and have no predators of their own in the ecosystem. Examples include large carnivores like lions or sharks.
No, green algae would not be found at the top of an energy pyramid. They are producers that form the base of the pyramid, converting sunlight into energy through photosynthesis. Organisms higher up in the pyramid, like herbivores and carnivores, consume the green algae for energy.
You would find a turkey closer to the top of an energy pyramid, as they are primary consumers that feed on plants or other organisms lower in the food chain.
The energy pyramid shows how the amount of useful energy, food, decreases as organisms in that level use it. Even though a lot of energy may be taken in at any level, more energy in the form of food that is available to the next level, is stored on the bottom level and decreases at each level as you move to the top of the pyramid. Thus, there is much less energy to support organisms at the top, so there are fewer in most communities.
a pyramid of energy shows how organisms get or produce their food
The top of the pyramid was called the capstone.
Plants represent the base of the Energy Pyramid.