There are not more tens. The cardinality ("count") of the set of tens is exactly the same as the cardinality of the set of hundreds.
The mapping f(x) = 10x where x is a multiple of 10 is bijective. Consequently, its domain and range are of the same "size".
The words "count" and "size" are in quotation marks because the relevant values are infinite.
5284
709
617
The number that has 7 tens and less hundreds than tens is 70. Since 7 tens equals 70, and there are no hundreds (0 hundreds), this satisfies the condition of having fewer hundreds than tens. Thus, the number is 70.
224 has.
849 has 8 hundreds, 4 fewer tens than hundreds, and 5 more ones than tens.
571
what number has 3 hundreds, 4 more tens than hundreds, and 1 more one than hundreds
what number has 9 hundreds, 2 fewer tens than hundreds, and 2 fewer ones than hundreds
135
5284
709
617
It is 689.
The number that has 7 tens and less hundreds than tens is 70. Since 7 tens equals 70, and there are no hundreds (0 hundreds), this satisfies the condition of having fewer hundreds than tens. Thus, the number is 70.
The number is 729.
Well, honey, in 1355, there are 5 tens and 13 hundreds. So, technically, there are 8 more hundreds than tens in that number. Math can be sassy sometimes, just like me!