There are not more tens. The cardinality ("count") of the set of tens is exactly the same as the cardinality of the set of hundreds.
The mapping f(x) = 10x where x is a multiple of 10 is bijective. Consequently, its domain and range are of the same "size".
The words "count" and "size" are in quotation marks because the relevant values are infinite.
5284
709
617
224 has.
619 has.
849 has 8 hundreds, 4 fewer tens than hundreds, and 5 more ones than tens.
571
what number has 3 hundreds, 4 more tens than hundreds, and 1 more one than hundreds
what number has 9 hundreds, 2 fewer tens than hundreds, and 2 fewer ones than hundreds
Oh, what a delightful little riddle we have here! Let's think about this together. If we have 6 hundreds, that's 600. Now, if we have 2 more tens than hundreds, that means we have 60 + 20 = 80. Lastly, if we have 1 more one than hundreds, that gives us 600 + 80 + 1 = 681. So, the number we're looking for is 681. Great job working through that with me!
135
5284
709
617
It is 689.
The number is 729.
Well, honey, in 1355, there are 5 tens and 13 hundreds. So, technically, there are 8 more hundreds than tens in that number. Math can be sassy sometimes, just like me!