They are not parallel if they meet. The only other possibility may be if they are the same line, in which case they are parallel, and meet in the distance (though there is no distinguishing one from the other).
No because parallel lines never and remain equal distance apart
The transversal line cuts through the parallel lines that are equal distance apart and never meet together.
They never meet, and the distance between them stays the same
infinity
Oh, dude, adjacent lines are like the neighbors of geometry. They just chill next to each other, but they don't necessarily run parallel. So, nah, adjacent lines don't have to be parallel. It's like saying just because you live next to someone, you must be best friends.
They are not parallel if they meet. The only other possibility may be if they are the same line, in which case they are parallel, and meet in the distance (though there is no distinguishing one from the other).
No because parallel lines never meet at all and they remain equal distance apart from one another.
No because parallel lines never and remain equal distance apart
Lines that meet are not parallel, and parallel lines never meet.
In Euclidean geometry, parallel lines are the same distance apart and never meet.
Parallel.
No because parallel lines remain equal distance apart and never intersect with each other.
The transversal line cuts through the parallel lines that are equal distance apart and never meet together.
Parallel lines meet in infinity(they don't meet at all)
They never meet, and the distance between them stays the same
infinity