The 'e' isn't necessary to the pronunciation of the word. Together, 'ea' would imply a hard 'ee' sound (like in beach, reach, teach). The spelling 'measureable' would more likely cause confusion.
No, there are only two e's in measurable, able to be measured.
Yes.
Measurable data is data that can be measure by a quantity. Measurable data is also known as quantitative data.
The data collected does not have to be measurable.
Yes, the inverse image of a measurable set under a continuous map is measurable. If ( f: X \to Y ) is a continuous function and ( A \subseteq Y ) is a measurable set, then the preimage ( f^{-1}(A) ) is measurable in ( X ). This property holds for various types of measurable spaces, including Borel and Lebesgue measurability. Thus, continuous functions preserve the measurability of sets through their inverse images.
measurable
No, there are only two e's in measurable, able to be measured.
You can, but it wouldn't bring you any measurable advantage.
The correct spelling of the adjective, from measure, is measurable (weighable, quantifiable).
Yes. For every measurable function, f there's a sequence of simple functions Fn that converge to f m-a.e (wich means for each e>0, there's X' such that Fn|x' -->f|x' and m(X\X')<e).
Yes.
Measurable data is data that can be measure by a quantity. Measurable data is also known as quantitative data.
yes.since this functin is simple .and evry simple function is measurable if and ond only if its domain (in this question one set) is measurable.
The data collected does not have to be measurable.
We need measurable criteria to assess your progress.
you put it like this i is iron put it in the crafting bench i i i i e i i e i e is for empty
"Measurable" is an adjective, and English adjectives do not distinguish between plural and singular.