0
Why should nurses expect to care for relatively larger numbers of older people over the next decades?
Wiki User
∙ 7y ago
Yes, baby boomers are aging and they will die in the next 40-50 years.
Wiki User
∙ 7y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Are there any more consecutive prime numbers?
The only prime numbers with a difference of 1 are the numbers 2 and 3. More consecutive numbers are not possible, since one of the two would have to be even - and an even number is divisible by 2, and therefore not a prime number (2, of course, is a prime number, but larger even numbers are not).The most you can expect with larger prime numbers is a difference of 2. Very large such "prime twins" are known; a few are 3 and 5; 101 and 103, but much larger ones are known, as well. It is not yet known whether there are an infinite number of twin primes.The only prime numbers with a difference of 1 are the numbers 2 and 3. More consecutive numbers are not possible, since one of the two would have to be even - and an even number is divisible by 2, and therefore not a prime number (2, of course, is a prime number, but larger even numbers are not).The most you can expect with larger prime numbers is a difference of 2. Very large such "prime twins" are known; a few are 3 and 5; 101 and 103, but much larger ones are known, as well. It is not yet known whether there are an infinite number of twin primes.The only prime numbers with a difference of 1 are the numbers 2 and 3. More consecutive numbers are not possible, since one of the two would have to be even - and an even number is divisible by 2, and therefore not a prime number (2, of course, is a prime number, but larger even numbers are not).The most you can expect with larger prime numbers is a difference of 2. Very large such "prime twins" are known; a few are 3 and 5; 101 and 103, but much larger ones are known, as well. It is not yet known whether there are an infinite number of twin primes.The only prime numbers with a difference of 1 are the numbers 2 and 3. More consecutive numbers are not possible, since one of the two would have to be even - and an even number is divisible by 2, and therefore not a prime number (2, of course, is a prime number, but larger even numbers are not).The most you can expect with larger prime numbers is a difference of 2. Very large such "prime twins" are known; a few are 3 and 5; 101 and 103, but much larger ones are known, as well. It is not yet known whether there are an infinite number of twin primes.
What is A set of numbers that is larger than the set of real numbers?
In a certain sense, the set of complex numbers is "larger" than the set of real numbers, since the set of real numbers is a proper subset of it.
Is the set of rational numbers is larger than the set of integers?
Yes, rational numbers are larger than integer because integers are part of rational numbers.
How can you compare rational numbers?
Subtract one from the other.If the answer is positive then the first is larger,if the answer is negative, then the second is larger.Rational numbers are numbers that can be expressed as fractions whereas irrational numbers can't be expressed as fractions.
Which is larger the set of natural numbers or the set of whole numbers?
D ko alam
Is 21 and 35 relatively prime?
You need to check whether they have a common factor. You can simply factor each of the numbers; for numbers that are much larger, using Euclid's algorithm is much faster.If the common factor of two numbers is greater than 1, then they are NOT relatively prime.
Which endocrine organs would you expect to be relatively larger in humans than cats?
The pituitary and thyroid glands are typically larger in humans compared to cats due to differences in hormone regulation and metabolic rates. Human adrenal glands are also relatively larger as they are essential for stress response and regulation in humans.
What pair of numbers is relatively prime 10 and 21 12 and 54 15 and 27 21 and 39?
I suggest factoring each pair of numbers, and checking whether they have, or don't have, common factors. A pair of numbers is said to be "relatively prime" if they have no common factors (their greatest common factor is 1). For larger numbers, Euclid's algorithm could be used, but for such small numbers, factoring is probably faster.
Are there any more consecutive prime numbers?
The only prime numbers with a difference of 1 are the numbers 2 and 3. More consecutive numbers are not possible, since one of the two would have to be even - and an even number is divisible by 2, and therefore not a prime number (2, of course, is a prime number, but larger even numbers are not).The most you can expect with larger prime numbers is a difference of 2. Very large such "prime twins" are known; a few are 3 and 5; 101 and 103, but much larger ones are known, as well. It is not yet known whether there are an infinite number of twin primes.The only prime numbers with a difference of 1 are the numbers 2 and 3. More consecutive numbers are not possible, since one of the two would have to be even - and an even number is divisible by 2, and therefore not a prime number (2, of course, is a prime number, but larger even numbers are not).The most you can expect with larger prime numbers is a difference of 2. Very large such "prime twins" are known; a few are 3 and 5; 101 and 103, but much larger ones are known, as well. It is not yet known whether there are an infinite number of twin primes.The only prime numbers with a difference of 1 are the numbers 2 and 3. More consecutive numbers are not possible, since one of the two would have to be even - and an even number is divisible by 2, and therefore not a prime number (2, of course, is a prime number, but larger even numbers are not).The most you can expect with larger prime numbers is a difference of 2. Very large such "prime twins" are known; a few are 3 and 5; 101 and 103, but much larger ones are known, as well. It is not yet known whether there are an infinite number of twin primes.The only prime numbers with a difference of 1 are the numbers 2 and 3. More consecutive numbers are not possible, since one of the two would have to be even - and an even number is divisible by 2, and therefore not a prime number (2, of course, is a prime number, but larger even numbers are not).The most you can expect with larger prime numbers is a difference of 2. Very large such "prime twins" are known; a few are 3 and 5; 101 and 103, but much larger ones are known, as well. It is not yet known whether there are an infinite number of twin primes.
Why would you expect a carnivore to be a camouflaged larger than a herbivore?
[object Object]
Which atoms are relatively larger than oxygen atoms?
It is not hydrogen so it must be nitrogen and bromine since it has a higher atomic radius.
The effects of scaling are beneficial to swimmers who are relatively?
The answer is Large or Larger.
The significance of the is that it indicates to stockholders that they should not expect to receive the larger amount every year?
the significance of the is that it indicates to stockholders that they should not expect to receive the larger amount every year
What is smaller when its larger and larger when its smaller?
Negative Numbers.
Does the set of whole numbers is larger than the set of natural numbers?
If you mean larger by "the set of whole numbers strictly contains the set of natural numbers", then yes, but if you mean "the set of whole numbers has a larger cardinality (size) than the set of natural numbers", then no, they have the same size.
How long does it take to built a castle?
Castles took decades and decades to build - some of the larger, more decorated castles took 200 to 300 years to complete.
Is .5 larger than .54?
No, 0.54 is larger. For an easier comparison, add a "0" to the end of "0.5". "0.5" and "0.50" are the same number. Now that the two numbers, "0.50" and "0.54", have the same number of digits, they should be easier to compare. It would be no different than comparing the whole numbers: 54 and 50. One would expect 54 to be greater, which is the same case here.
