What are the alternatives?
A. Less than 0,
B. 0
C. between 0 and 1,
D 1.
A base less than 0 runs into all sorts of difficulties with fractional powers, such as square roots. Best avoided until you are an expert in complex numbers.
The Base of 0 and 1 are not particularly helpful. 0 to any positive exponent is 0 and to any negative exponent is undefined. 1 is not much better, since 1 raised to any power is 1 and that would not take you very far.
The base could be between 0 and 1, but that would be the same as using its reciprocal as the base and switching the signs on the exponents. It is intuitively simpler to have the base greater than 1 so that the bigger the power, the bigger the number.
So, although C is possible, it has not advantage over using a base greater than 1.
No, it does not. It the quantity being measured is less than it was in the base period, ten the index will be less than 100.No, it does not. It the quantity being measured is less than it was in the base period, ten the index will be less than 100.No, it does not. It the quantity being measured is less than it was in the base period, ten the index will be less than 100.No, it does not. It the quantity being measured is less than it was in the base period, ten the index will be less than 100.
no
It is because the index is related to the velocity of light in air (ideally vacuum) and the medium in question. Since the velocity of light in vacuum is greater than it can be in any other media, the index of refraction of these other media relative to the vacuum is greater than 1.However, if you studied light travelling through glass and then water, the index of refraction between those two would be 0.89 (approx).
It is not, so the question is based on a fundamental misunderstanding.
greater than > less than < The small end points to the smaller value.
The minimum value of the refractive index is 1, which corresponds to a vacuum. The refractive index of a medium is always greater than or equal to 1.
An alkali (base).
it is a base. So it is greater than <7
No, it does not. It the quantity being measured is less than it was in the base period, ten the index will be less than 100.No, it does not. It the quantity being measured is less than it was in the base period, ten the index will be less than 100.No, it does not. It the quantity being measured is less than it was in the base period, ten the index will be less than 100.No, it does not. It the quantity being measured is less than it was in the base period, ten the index will be less than 100.
5. It does not have a value greater than 12. Consequently, it does not have a value greater than 12 and less than 13.
A solution with a Kb value greater than 1 indicates that the base is strong. Strong bases ionize completely in solution, leading to a higher concentration of hydroxide ions. This results in a higher Kb value as it reflects the strength of the base in accepting protons.
In mathematics, when we comparing two values if any of the value has a larger value then the sign greater than is used for differentiating that the value is greater than the another value. > is the greater than sign, as in If x is greater than y,then x>y
Since they have the same unit you base which is more off of which has the biggest numerical value, and since 5 is greater than 3, 5 millimeters is greater.
roughly 10% lower than they were in the base year. lol Macroeconomics test
A pH value greater than 10 represents a strong base. Strong bases have a high concentration of hydroxide ions and can be corrosive.
no
The value of count should be more than max range of the for-loop. e.g. for (index=0;index<n;index++) ....In this case the count (i.e. index) would be more than "n" which is max-range.