Wiki User
∙ 11y agoBecause all foods fit in those groups and it may become hard to understand.
Wiki User
∙ 11y agohe Stages for acute injury is the RICE treatment or in more recent times the POLICE treatment
it increases
The chain rule, in calculus, is a formula. It allows one to compute the derivative of the composition of two or more functions. It was first used by the German mathematician Gottfried Leibniz.
The pyramid usually get thinner as you go up it because if you start off with one producer and 8 consumers there will be less secondary consumers because then there will be more food. I hope this helped!
Neither. They must be the same.
Food chains typically have fewer stages due to energy loss at each trophic level. As energy is transferred from one organism to another, some of it is lost as heat, leading to a decrease in available energy for each successive trophic level. This limits the number of stages in a food chain to ensure energy efficiency and sustainability.
A food chain is more relative. A food pyramid is more empirical. The food pyramid is more useful in determining food groups and needs.
because it's a chain...and the chains added together make a food web...duhh! ^ this is wrongg because so much energy passes of a food chain, there is not enough energy for any more species
There's more at the top of the food chain because there's more animals and food lower down.
the difference is that a food chain is smaller then a food web because a food web is more animals then a food chain
its just a more complicated form of a food chain
During the progression of each stage, the organisms in the food chain exert tons of energy. Most chains are broken down to four stages for that reason.
Typically, the food chain is like a pyramid more than a chain. The lower on the food chain an organism is, the more of them that there are, because the lower organisms are usually smaller so it takes more of them to feed the larger ones at the top. ie sardines eat plankton, tuna eat sardines, and sharks eat the tuna.....each one is bigger than the other so there are more plankton than tuna, and more tuna than sharks.
A food web can more readily react to changes in the environment that impact one or more species. Also a food web is sometimes strengthened by the loss of one or more species if that species is overly aggressive, whereas a food chain is only as strong as it's weakest link and is always diminished or destroyed by the loss of any member. In short, a food web is more adaptive than a food chain and usually more diverse with more opportunity for cooperative advantage, improving chances of survival over a chain for the included species, especially species higher in the web (further from photosynthesis).
because the humans has more energy
If the predator died in a food chain, there would likely be an increase in the population of the prey species. This increase in prey population could then have cascading effects on other species and the overall ecosystem, potentially leading to imbalances and shifts in the food web dynamics.
because it needs a lot of energy to get the food chain to cycle.