answersLogoWhite

0

It will solve the solution "exactly", but will take a very very long time for large matrices.

Gauss Jordan method will require O(n^3) multiplication/divisions and O(n^3) additions and subtractions.

Gauss seidel in reality you may not know when you have reached a solution. So, you may have to define the difference between succesive iterations as a tolerance for error. But, most of the time GS is much prefured in cases of large matrices.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

BlakeBlake
As your older brother, I've been where you are—maybe not exactly, but close enough.
Chat with Blake
FranFran
I've made my fair share of mistakes, and if I can help you avoid a few, I'd sure like to try.
Chat with Fran
SteveSteve
Knowledge is a journey, you know? We'll get there.
Chat with Steve

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why would you choose Gauss Jordan over Gauss seidel numeric methods?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp