Absolutely. It won't be hurt as badly as not paying, but your credit report usually shows a status that reads "pays as agreed." If you're paying less than the minimum amount due each month, you're not paying as agreed and your credit can get dinged.
The fairest amount is ten thousand dollars, because that's the amount that both parties agreed on when the money was loaned. Anything less than that has to be a new agreement between the parties, either in person or in court.
What you're describing, when someone pays back a loan quickly, is often referred to as "early repayment" or "early payoff" of the loan. This means the borrower is making payments ahead of the scheduled repayment plan or paying off the entire loan balance before the agreed-upon term ends. In terms of algebra, if you want to represent this concept mathematically, you can use variables and equations. For example, let's say: A represents the initial loan amount. r represents the annual interest rate (as a decimal). t represents the time period (in years) for the loan. The standard formula to calculate the total amount paid on a loan is: Total Amount Paid = A + A * r * t If someone pays back the loan quickly, they would reduce the value of 't' (time). The solution would involve modifying the equation to reflect the early repayment, which would result in paying less interest and possibly reducing the total amount paid. The specific solution would depend on the details of the loan and the early repayment terms.
Depends of what. I would be thrilled to have .44% of the worlds gold, but only .44% of a dollar would be useless, less than a penny. I would say in general, .44 percent is a low amount.
Four. Any less and it wouldn't be three dimensional-- it would be a polygon.
British tourists would have the largest amount, but it would be less than 60%.British tourists would have the largest amount, but it would be less than 60%.British tourists would have the largest amount, but it would be less than 60%.British tourists would have the largest amount, but it would be less than 60%.British tourists would have the largest amount, but it would be less than 60%.British tourists would have the largest amount, but it would be less than 60%.British tourists would have the largest amount, but it would be less than 60%.British tourists would have the largest amount, but it would be less than 60%.British tourists would have the largest amount, but it would be less than 60%.British tourists would have the largest amount, but it would be less than 60%.British tourists would have the largest amount, but it would be less than 60%.
Absolutely. It won't be hurt as badly as not paying, but your credit report usually shows a status that reads "pays as agreed." If you're paying less than the minimum amount due each month, you're not paying as agreed and your credit can get dinged.
Even if you gave it to a qualified charity (not to "someone") and could take the entire value as a charitable deduction, and had the otherwise taxable income to offset that amount of deduction, all you would save is the amount of tax you would have paid on the amount your now deducting. So financially, you'll get much less than if you sold it. And, generally, the gain on sale of your house isn't taxable, so you would get to keep all of the sales amount.
Risk averse manager is someone who is afraid of or sensitive to risk. An individual that would trade for sure amount that is less than the expected value of the gamble.
The fairest amount is ten thousand dollars, because that's the amount that both parties agreed on when the money was loaned. Anything less than that has to be a new agreement between the parties, either in person or in court.
Paid repossession would be the best option. This, even though it is a negative mark, is less so due to the satisfaction of the debt. Count yourself fortunate, as the lender could list it as paid-settlement, which would be less positive.
i thick when you pay less in a over draft
Someone with less than perfect vision.
So what amount does make it 'okay' to steal? If it is less then $10 is it okay to steal? It is a crime to steal. The amount is not important, it is the moral character that is demonstrated that makes it bad. Your employer is entitled to fire you if you steal even less.
If you are suing someone for an amount less then 5,000 you can take them to small claims court. However check your state guidelines on the amount, as each state varies.
The less command can be used to scroll through a large amount of text that would otherwise move off the screen.
If the custodial parent agreed to deviate from the original child support amount, she can increase it back to the original amount if there is a court order. In additional, the non-custodial parent may have to pay back child support for the time when he paid less.