There are an infinite series of numbers that are divisible by 228. Two of them are 456 and 684.On the other hand, if the questioner had meant "what is 228 divisible by?", then the answer is 2, 3, and 19, of which 2 applies twice.1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 12, 19, 38, 57, 76, 114, 228
No.
No since only numbers in which its sum can be divisible by 3 is divisible by 3. 2 + 4 + 4 is 10, and 10 is not divisible by 3.
1, 2, 7, 3 and 6 are not divisible by 4 and/or 9. 12736 is divisible by 4 but not by 9.
Its divisible by 2 and 4.
There are an infinite series of numbers that are divisible by 228. Two of them are 456 and 684.On the other hand, if the questioner had meant "what is 228 divisible by?", then the answer is 2, 3, and 19, of which 2 applies twice.1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 12, 19, 38, 57, 76, 114, 228
are 2 and 8 divisible by 4
57 is the only one evenly divisible by 19 (or 3) ...and the other three are prime numbers
No.
3 is divisible by neither 2 nor 4. 3 divided by 2 is 11/2 = 1.5 3 divided by 4 is 3/4 = 0.75
57 is divisible by 3 so it is composite. A prime number has only 2 factors which are 1 and itself. Composite numbers are everything else except 1, 2, and 0. 1, 2, and 0 have a different name.
684 is divisible by any real number, but I assume you mean whole number denominators, which would be 2, 4, 6, 12, 18, 38, 57, 114, 171, 342
No, 228 is divisible by 4.
No since only numbers in which its sum can be divisible by 3 is divisible by 3. 2 + 4 + 4 is 10, and 10 is not divisible by 3.
1, 2, 7, 3 and 6 are not divisible by 4 and/or 9. 12736 is divisible by 4 but not by 9.
650130 is not divisible by 4, but it is divisible by 2, 3, 5, 6, and 10
not divisible by 9.but it is divisible by 4.