answersLogoWhite

0

No, 100 and 202 are not relatively prime. Relatively prime numbers only have the number 1 as a common factor. The number 1 is a common factor for them, but the number 2 is another common factor that they have, so they are not relatively prime.

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

DevinDevin
I've poured enough drinks to know that people don't always want advice—they just want to talk.
Chat with Devin
FranFran
I've made my fair share of mistakes, and if I can help you avoid a few, I'd sure like to try.
Chat with Fran
TaigaTaiga
Every great hero faces trials, and you—yes, YOU—are no exception!
Chat with Taiga
More answers

Yes, they do not have any prime factors in common so they are relatively prime.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago
User Avatar

No, they are not relatively prime.

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago
User Avatar

NO

User Avatar

Wiki User

7y ago
User Avatar

No.

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Are 100 and 202 relatively prime?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp