0

Are 100 and 202 relatively prime?

Updated: 8/30/2023

Wiki User

7y ago

No, 100 and 202 are not relatively prime. Relatively prime numbers only have the number 1 as a common factor. The number 1 is a common factor for them, but the number 2 is another common factor that they have, so they are not relatively prime.

Wiki User

7y ago

Wiki User

14y ago

Yes, they do not have any prime factors in common so they are relatively prime.

Wiki User

8y ago

No, they are not relatively prime.

Wiki User

6y ago

NO

Wiki User

7y ago

No.

Earn +20 pts
Q: Are 100 and 202 relatively prime?
Submit
Still have questions?
Related questions

What pair of numbers is relatively prime 26 and 99 90 and 117 100 and 202 201 and 444?

26 and 99 is the only pair which is relatively prime.

How many prime numbers in 100 are relatively prime?

Any prime number is relatively prime to any other prime number.

What is the largest number less than 100 that is relatively prime to 167?

Since 167 is a prime, any number smaller that 167 will be relatively prime. So, the largest number less than 100, that is 99, is relatively prime.

What are all the composite numbers between 50 and 100 that are relatively prime?

A single number cannot be relatively prime. Any pair of numbers between 50 and 100 of which one is a prime will be relatively prime. There are 728 pairs of numbers that are relatively prime and I have neither the time nor patience to list them all!

What are the prime factors for 202?

The prime factors of 202 are: 2, 101

Are 87 and 100 relatively prime?

Both 87 and 100 are composite numbers.

What are the factors and prime factors of 202?

The factors of 202 are: 1 2 101 202.The prime factors are: 2, 101

What two prime numbers can be multiplied to get 202?

There are no two prime numbers that can be multiplied to get 202.

202 = 2*101

Find prime factorization of 202?

202 2 101 202 2 101

Are 27 and 117 relatively prime?

No, they are not relatively prime.

The GCF is 2.