answersLogoWhite

0

No, 100 and 202 are not relatively prime. Relatively prime numbers only have the number 1 as a common factor. The number 1 is a common factor for them, but the number 2 is another common factor that they have, so they are not relatively prime.

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

ProfessorProfessor
I will give you the most educated answer.
Chat with Professor
BlakeBlake
As your older brother, I've been where you are—maybe not exactly, but close enough.
Chat with Blake
EzraEzra
Faith is not about having all the answers, but learning to ask the right questions.
Chat with Ezra
More answers

Yes, they do not have any prime factors in common so they are relatively prime.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago
User Avatar

No, they are not relatively prime.

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago
User Avatar

NO

User Avatar

Wiki User

7y ago
User Avatar

No.

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Are 100 and 202 relatively prime?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp