Best Answer

Not if you include negative numbers.

Q: Are choosing a multiple of 5 and choosing a number less than 5 mutually exclusive?

Write your answer...

Submit

Still have questions?

Continue Learning about Movies & Television

A common multiple

No number between 61 and 107 is a multiple of 41020. A multiple is a number that another number can divide into. The lowest multiple of any number is itself. You may have meant factors, which is a number that divides into a multiple of itself. In that case there is a factor of 41020 between 61 and 107. That number is 70.

300, 600 and 900.

Every multiple of 80 is. There are an infinite number of them.

27 cannot be a multiple of 4 because 27 is an odd number and 4 is an even number. No odd number can be a multiple of an even number, only even numbers can be multiples of even numbers.

Related questions

No, the two are mutually exclusive.

If A and B are mutually exclusive, P(A or B)=P(A) + P(B) They both cannot occur together. For example: A die is rolled. A = an odd number; B= number is divisible by 2. P(A or B) = 1/3 + 1/3 = 2/3

60.371 is the ratio of 60,371 to 1,000. It's a rational, real number. Moreover, since it's a rational number, it can't be an irrational number. Those two descriptions are mutually exclusive.

Neither is "bigger" or "smaller"; nor are they mutually exclusive. AVI is a container format for audio and video, which can be in any number of formats, including WMV.

No. In fact, a number cannot be both rational and irrational; they're mutually exclusive concepts.

When recording observations that fall into a small number of mutually exclusive (ie not overlapping) categories. When analysing a large number of observations of a discrete variable, or a variable that has been put into classes (intervals), so that there are several observations in each.

Numbers cannot be rational and irrational at the same time.

Answer # 1If the 2x2 squares are mutually exclusive (i.e. non-overlapping), then the maximum number of 2x2 squares on a standard 8 x 8 board is 8x8 / (2x2) = 64 / 4 = 16.

If your question was really "Are 3 and 1 mutually prime?" The answer is no as by definition nothing can be mutually prime with 1 (which also by definition is not a prime number). The first prime number is 2. The second is 3. The third is 5. The fourth is 7. The fifth is 11. etc. However numbers can be "mutually prime" even when the numbers themselves are not prime numbers. For example 12 and 6 are neither mutually prime nor prime numbers, but 15 and 4 are mutually prime but neither is a prime number.

It makes no sense to ask for the greatest common multiple of two numbers. If the numbers are two and three, a common multiple is 2 x 3 x any number you like ! Since the third number can be as big as you choose, so there is no limit to a g.c.m.You probably meant to ask for the least common multiple. Since 12 and 37 are mutually prime, the l.c.m is just 12 x 37 or 444.

Not quite. The listing must also be exhaustive: it must contain all possible outcomes.For the roll of a fair cubic die, consider the following:Prob(1) = 1/6Prob(2) = 1/6This is a mutually exclusive listing of the outcomes of the experiment and the corresponding probabilities of occurrence but it is not a probability distribution because it does not include all possible outcomes. As a result, the total of the listed probabilities is less than 1.

Any number that is not a multiple of 7.Any number that is not a multiple of 7.Any number that is not a multiple of 7.Any number that is not a multiple of 7.