No, 250/3 = 83 remainder 1
3 is not a factor of 250 : the prime factors are 2 x 5 x 5 x 5 (2 x 53).
3 is not divisible by 126. 126 is divisible by 3.
3 is not divisible by 72. 72 is divisible by 3.
512 is not divisible by 3.
Multiples of 9 and 6 are also divisible by three, the reverse is not true. 15 is divisible by 3, but not 6 or 9. 27 is divisible by 3 and 9, but not 6. 12 is divisible by 3 and 6, but not 9. 54 is divisible by 3, 6 and 9.
A number is divisible by 6 if it is divisible both by 2 and 3 1240 is even then is divisible by 2 1+2+4+0 = 7 which is not divisible by 3 then 1240 is not divisible by 3 Thus 1240 is not divisible by 6
Yes. 193 is divisible by 1 and 193. It is a prime number.
Itself and one because 193 is a prime number
The number 965 is divisible by 1, 5, 193, and 965. To determine this, you can check for factors: 965 ends in a 5, indicating it is divisible by 5. Additionally, since 965 can be factored into 5 × 193, both 5 and 193 are factors of 965.
There are 193 numbers in between 1 and 250 that are divisible by 2, 3, 5, or 7. Note that if you are not including 250 (so if you meant 1 - 249), then there are 192.
193 is prime. It is only evenly divisible by itself and one.
The factors of 772 are: 1, 2, 4, 193, 386, 772
3, 5, 15, 31, 93, 155, 193, 465, 579, 965, 2895, 5983, 17949, 29915.
No, 193 is not in the 3 times tables. When you divide 193 by 3, the result is approximately 64.33, which is not an integer. Therefore, 193 cannot be expressed as a multiple of 3.
Yes, as it is only divisible by one and itself.Yes 193 is a prime number because it has only two factors which are itself and one193 is prime.
No, it is divisible by 3.No, it is divisible by 3.No, it is divisible by 3.No, it is divisible by 3.
64.3333
It is divisible by 3, for example.It is divisible by 3, for example.It is divisible by 3, for example.It is divisible by 3, for example.