Factors of 62: 1, 2, 31, 62Factors of 24: 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24GCF (62, 24) = 2
The factors of 62 are: 1, 2, 31, 62 The factors of 68 are: 1, 2, 4, 17, 34, 68
It's not. 4 is a multiple of 2. 2 is a factor of 4 because it can divide into 4 evenly with no remainder.
Least Common Multiple (LCM) for 62 48 is 1,488.
Since 4 is a multiple of 2, it is automatically the LCM.
No - a smaller number can never be a multiple of a number, only a factor. But 4 is not a factor of 62, either.
The LCM is: 62
Because it is a multiple of 2 .
2 is the lowest common multiple of 12 and 62.
372
4 with 2 remaining 62 - 2 = 60 = 15 x 4
Since 62 is a composite number and not prime you can check for divisibility by 31 and 2. To check for divisibility by 31 take the last digit of your number and multiply it by four, then add the result to your original number, deleting the last number ex. 624 to test would be 62 + (4*4) = 78 you continue in this fashion until a multiple of 31 and 2 are found. If they are not than it is not a multiple of 62 sources: I am a human calculator, experience
62
The factors of 124 are: 1, 2, 4, 31, 62, 124.
Any multiple of 4 is also a multiple of 2.
1, 2, 31, 62 1, 2, 4, 31, 62, 124
No, but vice versa holds true. Case and point: 6 is a multiple of 2, but not a multiple of 4. 8 is a multiple of 4, and is a multiple of 2. Because a factor of 4 is 2, every multiple of 4 is also a multiple of 2. But since 4 is not a factor of 2, rather, only half of it, only half of the multiples of 2 will be multiples of 4.