answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

No. 3n isn't a factor of 3n + 7.

The GCF of 3n + 7 and 9n is 1.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

DevinDevin
I've poured enough drinks to know that people don't always want advice—they just want to talk.
Chat with Devin
ReneRene
Change my mind. I dare you.
Chat with Rene
ViviVivi
Your ride-or-die bestie who's seen you through every high and low.
Chat with Vivi

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: The gcf of the expressions 3n plus 7 and 9n is 3n?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Movies & Television

Is 3n the gcf of 3n plus 7 and 9n?

No. 3n is not a factor of 3n + 7.


Is 3n the gcf of 3n 7 and 9n?

No. 3n is not a factor of 3n + 7.


What is the GCF of 6n to the third power and 9n to the third power?

The GCF is 3n3


How do you factor 2n2 9n-81?

6n² - 18n - 18 = 6, so 6n² - 18n - 24 = 0.Dividing by 6:n² - 3n - 4 = 0.What multiplies to -4 and adds to -3? The only possible factors are:(-1)4(-2)2(-4)1...with sums of 3, 0, and -3, respectively. We want that last one, son² - 3n - 4 = (n - 4)(n + 1).


Is the square root of 14 an irrational number?

Yes, here's the proof. Let's start out with the basic inequality 81 < 83 < 100. Now, we'll take the square root of this inequality: 9 < √83 < 10. If you subtract all numbers by 9, you get: 0 < √83 - 9 < 1. If √83 is rational, then it can be expressed as a fraction of two integers, m/n. This next part is the only remotely tricky part of this proof, so pay attention. We're going to assume that m/n is in its most reduced form; i.e., that the value for n is the smallest it can be and still be able to represent √83. Therefore, √83n must be an integer, and n must be the smallest multiple of √83 to make this true. If you don't understand this part, read it again, because this is the heart of the proof. Now, we're going to multiply √83n by (√83 - 9). This gives 83n - 9√83n. Well, 83n is an integer, and, as we explained above, √83n is also an integer, so 9√83n is an integer too; therefore, 83n - 9√83n is an integer as well. We're going to rearrange this expression to (√83n - 9n)√83 and then set the term (√83n - 9n) equal to p, for simplicity. This gives us the expression √83p, which is equal to 83n - 9√83n, and is an integer. Remember, from above, that 0 < √83 - 9 < 1. If we multiply this inequality by n, we get 0 < √83n - 9n < n, or, from what we defined above, 0 < p < n. This means that p < n and thus √83p < √83n. We've already determined that both √83p and √83n are integers, but recall that we said n was the smallest multiple of √83 to yield an integer value. Thus, √83p < √83n is a contradiction; therefore √83 can't be rational and so must be irrational. Q.E.D.