An empirical formula contains the constituent elements in the lowest possible mathematical whole-number ratio. In some cases, this is the legitimate formula for the compound, particularly if the substance you're dealing with is an ionic compound. Sometimes, however, the actual formula, known as the molecular formula, is a whole-number multiple of the empirical formula. The molecular formula for glucose is C6H12O6. However, an empirically-derived formula for glucose would be CH2O, which is the lowest possible ratio of carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen in that compound.
The answer depends on what other information is available to you. With no other information, it is not possible.
formula of ammotal
I do not know, It's a secret!
The chemical formula of aragonite is CaCO3.
The term "soda" can apply to several chemicals. Sodium carbonate (Na2CO3), sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3), sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and sodium oxide (Na2O) are all possible candidates.
It is possible.
Formula: FI2 However this compound is not possible
There are two possible structures for a tetrahedral molecule with the formula AHXYZ. One structure is where the central atom (A) is in the center of the tetrahedron, and the other is where A occupies one of the vertices of the tetrahedron.
A egg is not a chemical compound; consequently any chemical formula is possible.
There is no such formula since most of the possible permutations will not be words.
The empirical formula.
This compound is hypothetical and is not possible it is P4O10
No, it is not possible to have a negative solution when using the distance formula. Even if you were to go backwards, the distance would still be a positive number.
There is a proof that there is no such formula for generating all the prime numbers. Best, TSA
Compounds of mendelevium are unknown up today; a possible chemical formula is MdCl3.
Very probable the xenon trichloride is not known today. The possible formula will be XeCl3.