The size of the shape changes with a similarity transformation (enlargement), whereas it does not with a congruence transformation.
We definitely need to see the drawing that goes along with that question before we can even begin to try and answer it.
SAS
Frogs are amphibians, bees are insects - there is no similarity.
2d transformation
An example of a biochemical similarity between two different organisms is the presence of cytochrome c, a protein involved in the electron transport chain, which is found in both humans and yeast. Despite the vast evolutionary distance between these organisms, the structure and function of cytochrome c are remarkably conserved. This similarity underscores the shared biochemical pathways that are fundamental to cellular respiration across diverse life forms, highlighting the common ancestry of all living organisms.
false
Similarity is almost the same and Congruency is completely the same.
Yes. Congruence implies similarity. Though similarity is not enough for congruence.
Since ASA is a congruence postulate and congruence implies similarity, then the answer is : yes.
Yes. Congruence implies similarity. Though similarity may not be enough for congruence. Congruence means they are exactly the same size and shape.
Reflecting
No. Congruence implies similarity, so they are also similar. Though similarity is not enough for congruence.
stretching
yes
Congruence is the two use same size and shape similarity is whe two look the same but not using same size and shape
Similarity is where triangles have equal angles at each corner. Congruence is where triangles have sides of equal length.
No it doesn't. It guarantees similarity, but not congruence.