An empirical formula contains the constituent elements in the lowest possible mathematical whole-number ratio. In some cases, this is the legitimate formula for the compound, particularly if the substance you're dealing with is an ionic compound. Sometimes, however, the actual formula, known as the molecular formula, is a whole-number multiple of the empirical formula. The molecular formula for glucose is C6H12O6. However, an empirically-derived formula for glucose would be CH2O, which is the lowest possible ratio of carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen in that compound.
You calculate it using the appropriate formula, which, given the limitations of this site, is not easy to reproduce. However, you can easily Google the formula.
Rays are a line that starts but, does not end. Sun rays start but, do not end for a long time.
To find the multiple of a number, add the number to itself.
The number is 7.
There are infinitely many rays.
There are an infinite number of parallelograms. No formula is required.
It will find a number - if the number is not a formula. For example - if you search for the number 30 it will find it - BUT - if the product in a cell is the result of a formula it will disregard it.
1234 and you will see its triagular
Gamma rays hasn't a mass number.
The answer depends on what number is missing and what numbers are known!
just don't do the question.
There is a proof that there is no such formula for generating all the prime numbers. Best, TSA
The formula is: 0.5*(n2-3n) where n is the number of sides of the polygon
First, its centimetre, not centremetre. The formula is to multiply the number of metres by 100. So simple!
http://www.johansens.us/sane/technotes/formula.htm
subtract the lowest number from the heigest