No. To be a factor of a number, that number has to be divisible by the number you are finding factors for. True, 0 can be divided by 0, but a factor has to be a positive number. 0 is not positve nor is it negitive.
0.
remainder
If the imaginary part of z is 0, then z is simply a real number and if you multiply by 1 which is the identity in multiplication of real numbers, you of course will still have a real number with imaginary part 0
The greatest common factor (GCF) of 42 and 63 is 21.To find the GCF (greatest common factor) of two numbers, first prime factorize them.42 = 2*3*763 = 3*3*7The GCF must be able to contain factors such that if divided by 42 or 63, the answer will be an integer.The GCF is 21.21
215
0 Any number times 0 = 0
This series is of the function f(x) = x2+1, starting with x=0.The next number in the series is 26. The number after that is 37.
It appears that the sequence is: {| |- | 0 1 3 7 15 31 63 127 255 511 1023 2047 4095 8191 |}
It is 63 because it has more than two factors
The largest unsigned integer is 26 - 1 = 63, giving the range 0 to 63; The largest signed integer is 25 - 1 = 31, giving the range -32 to 31.
The pattern is t(n) = n3 - 1
7 x 9 = 63 Therefore, the larger number is 63.
63 is a composite number. A prime number has only 2 factors which are 1 and itself. Composite numbers are everything else except 1 and 0. 1 and 0 are neither prime, nor composite. (63 has more that two factors: 1, 3, 7, 9, 21, and 63)
13 is a prime number, 63 is a composite number. A prime number has only 2 factors which are 1 and itself. Composite numbers are everything else except 1 and 0. 1 and 0 are neither prime, nor composite.
0 x 10^26 = 0
A prime number has only 2 factors which are 1 and itself. Composite numbers are everything else except 1 and 0. 1 and 0 are neither prime, nor composite. 63 is composite.