Always
no
The common denominator of any two or more whole numbers, such as 100 and 150, will always be one (1) because 'common denominator' refers to the denominators of two or more fractions or mixed numbers, not whole numbers. So, a set of whole numbers (x,x) would have to be converted to their fraction equivalents, i.e., x/1, which will always yield a denominator of 1.
Mostly. Watch out for the exceptions like 3/3 or 18/9.
There is no greatest common denominator, for whatever figure someone comes up with for the greatest common denominator, I can always add the lowest common denominator of 66 and 93 (which is 2046) and get an even higher common denominator.
There is none because Least Common Denominator (or LCD) refers to the Least Common Multiple (LCM) of the denominators of two or more fractions or mixed numbers. Even if you converted your whole numbers (x) to their fraction equivalents (x/1), the LCD would always be 1.
Their GCF is 1.
On a fraction: 1 <---------numerator ------- 2 <------------denominator Remember that the "D"enominator is always "D"own on the bottom.
There is always a GCF, even if it's only 1. If the GCF of the numerator and the denominator is 1, the fraction is already in its simplest form.
That is why it is called an improper fraction because a proper or a common fraction always has its numerator less than its denominator.
The numerator is on top. The bottom is the denominator. I always remember D for down (denominator)
Yes. If the numerator (on top) is higher or equal to the denominator (bottom) than its an improper fraction. If the numerator and denominator are the same then the fraction is considered a whole number and always comes out 1. If the numerator is higher than the denominator then you must divide the numerator by the denominator.
the numerator always has to be less than the denominator and if its equal like 5 to 5 that is 1
Not necessarily.
Both proper and improper fractions have a numerator and a denominator. In a proper fraction the numerator is always less than the denominator. In an improper function the numerator is greater than the denominator
Well, honey, finding the greatest common factor of the numerator and denominator is like finding that one friend who always has your back. By identifying the largest number that both the top and bottom can be divided by, you can simplify the fraction to its lowest terms. It's like decluttering your closet - getting rid of the unnecessary stuff to make things simpler and more efficient.
If a fraction is equivalent to one-half then the numerator is always half the denominator. Or, the double the numerator is the denominator. So, given any other fraction, p/q, if 2p < q then the fraction < 1/2 if 2p = q then the fraction = 1/2 if 2p > q then the fraction > 1/2
It's not. The improper fraction 26/13 is not in its simplest form.