Factor trees are intended to find prime factors, one isn't prime. The process of factoring is intended to break down the number. Since factoring out one still leaves the original number, it isn't useful.
No because you have to have a prime number besides 1 like 2,5,7 because every time you use a factor tree and you put a 1 as prime you keep getting one every time.So one can not be use as a factor when doing a factor tree.
The purpose of a factor tree is to divide a number into prime factors. 1 is not a prime number.
39 3,13
2 1, 2
19 is already prime. No need for a tree.19 is prime. No tree.
37 is a prime number so it cant be broken into a factor tree. its only factors are 37 and 1
no
109 109 x 1 This is all there is to the factor tree, because 109 is a prime number. Normally, I wouldn't use 1 in a factor tree, but I do in this case to make it clear that I have done a factor tree, since 109 is only divisible by itself and 1.
No because you have to have a prime number besides 1 like 2,5,7 because every time you use a factor tree and you put a 1 as prime you keep getting one every time.So one can not be use as a factor when doing a factor tree.
The purpose of a factor tree is to divide a number into prime factors. 1 is not a prime number.
Factor tree for 51: 51 * 1 or 17 * 3 Factor tree for 255: 255 * 1 or 51 * 5
1x1=1 its only one because you could only multiply 1 by 1 which equals 1. Could anything else go into 1? No. It cant also be in a factor Tree and neither can zero
39 3,13
1 and 5939
1 and 31
2 1, 2
23×1×2