-8
The orbital designation "4p 3s 2d 5f" is invalid because it does not follow the proper order of filling orbitals according to the Aufbau principle. The correct order is 1s, 2s, 2p, 3s, 3p, 4s, 3d, 4p, 5s, 4d, 5p, 6s, 4f, 5d, 6p, 7s, 5f, 6d, and 7p.
It may be the Aufbau Principle if you are looking for specifics. or just an electron configuration with 1s, 2s, 2p, 3s, 3p, 3d, etc.
My heart sank as I reached the end of this question and realized that tragically I must pass on this one because the comma on my keyboard doesn't work
The order of electron orbitals following the Aufbau principle is: 1s, 2s, 2p, 3s, 3p, 4s, 3d, 4p, 5s, 4d, 5p, 6s, 4f, 5d, 6p, 7s, 5f, 6d, and 7p. Electrons fill the orbitals in increasing energy levels.
4p+2 = 3p-7 4p-3p = -7-2 p = -9
1s 2s 3s 3p 4s 3d 4p
simply add the like terms: 4p -3p +2q -2q = p
4p+7q
4p + 9 + (-7p) + 2 = 4p - 7p + 9 + 2 = -3p + 11
4p+9-7p+2 -3p+11 p = 11/3
6
6
11-3p
3p+5+p = -23 3p+p = -23-5 4p = -28 p = -7
p+2 = 2-3p p+3p = 2-2 4p = 0 p = 0
3p + 6 = 4p + 6 This implies that, 3p - 4p = 6 - 6 -1p = 0 Therefore, p = 0/-1 = 0