Neither miles nor km. are more or less precise. The advantages of using the metric system (SI, to be prcise) are (1) That it is easier to do conversions; for example, 17 km. = 17,000 m. (just add three zeroes); try to do the same with miles and feet! (2) That it is an international standard; it makes it easier to communicate if everyone uses the same units.
3526 yards is more precise because it provides a more specific measurement than 2 miles, which is a rough estimate.
1900 miles is bigger than 505 kilometers. 1900 miles is equivalent to approximately 3057 kilometers.
3 kilometers is bigger than 2 miles. 1 mile is equivalent to approximately 1.61 kilometers, so 2 miles would be around 3.22 kilometers, which is less than 3 kilometers.
No, 15 kilometers is smaller than 9 miles. 9 miles is approximately equal to 14.48 kilometers.
1 kilometer = 0.62 mile (Approximately)so,300 km = 300 *0.62 = 186 milesthen 300 km is shorter than 200 mile
3526 yards is more precise because it provides a more specific measurement than 2 miles, which is a rough estimate.
No, it is less than 26.2 miles.
By unit of length and distance and conversion ,we can say that 1 km =1000 m metres are more precise than km
Close, but not quite. 5 kilometers is a little more than 3.1 miles
Yes.
Miles are longer than kilometers so 10 miles would be more.
yes, because if it was in km it would be 5.011km, which has more significant figures
It is a little less than 357 miles. 356.67 miles to be more exact.
9 kilometers is longer than 5 miles.
44.49 is more precise than 44.5 but less precise than 44.491 - The larger a number becomes the more precise it is.
2 miles is a longer distance than 2 kilometers.
No. Since 1 mile is about 1,6 km, 100 miles is more than 100 km.