To find the number of linear meters in 400 square meters, you need to know the dimensions of the area. If the area is a square (all sides are equal), you would take the square root of 400 to find the length of one side, which is 20 meters. Otherwise, if you have a rectangular area, you would need the length and width to calculate the linear meters.
None, since there can be no conversion.A linear (or lineal) metre is a measure of length in 1-dimensional space. A square metre is a measure of area in 2-dimensional space. The two measure different things and, according to basic principles of dimensional analysis, any attempt at conversion from one to the other is fundamentally flawed.
To calculate the volume of a flat surface, you need to determine the area of the surface multiplied by its thickness or depth. This will give you the volume of the flat surface.
To find the number of square feet in 472,000,000 cubic feet, we need to know the dimensions of the area in question. If the area is a square, then you can take the square root of the volume. However, if it's a cube, you can take the cube root to find the side length and then square that to find the area in square feet.
400 cubic feet does not directly convert to square feet as they are measuring different dimensions. Cubic feet measure volume (3-dimensional space) while square feet measure area (2-dimensional space). To find the square footage of a shape with a volume of 400 cubic feet, you would need additional information about the shape (such as height or depth).
NO. This is the way to get the volume of a prism, not the surface area of any three-dimensional figure. To find the surface area of a three-dimensional figure, you must find the area of each of its faces and then add the side-areas together.
None exist. A square is a measurement of area, length is a linear measurement and volume is a capacity. To find the lengths of a square from the area, take the square root of the area. To find the lengths of a cube from the volume, take the cube root of the volume. To clarify: Area refers to a two-dimensional space. Volume is three dimensional, and thus appropriate for a cube or ball, not a square or circle.
You need to find the area of each two dimensional surface on the figure. Do you have a specific figure in mind?
A square has width and height. Width is the horizontal line, height is the vertical line. This is a two-dimensional object and has an area.A cube is a square with one more dimension, length, which makes it a three dimensional object. As a three-dimensional object, it no longer has an area, but now has volume.To find the area of a cube (a three-dimensional object), one must multiply three dimensions (length, width, and height) to obtain the volume of the cube.
TRUE: To find the surface area of a three dimensional figure, you must find the area of each of its faces and then add them together.
False.To find the surface area of a three-dimensional figure, find the area of the faces and add them together.
A circle is not three-dimensional. It is a two-dimensional shape than can have an area, but not a volume. A column or cannister would have calculable volumes because they are three-dimensional shapes.To find the area of any circle, just remember 'Pie are square'. Of course, everybody knows that cakes are square and pies are round, but this is a different sort of pie. It is actually spelled pi. And the 'are' is actually an 'r' to signify 'radius'. In math, when we 'square' something, we are multiplying it by itself.
... face and add them together.
Rhombi are two dimensional, but the easiest way to find the area is to treat it like a parallelogram, or even a square. Just find Base x Height and you will get the area of a two dimensional rhombus, square, or parallelogram (among other polygons).Since volume is a three dimensional property, and rhombi are two dimensional, I will assume you just have an extruded rhombus. If I am correct, then you can just add the depth to that formula, giving you Base x Height x Depth.
The surface area of the 3-D figure will be the total of the areas of the 2-D figures.
No, you must add, not multiply.
This question doesn't make any sense. A square metre is a two dimensional measurement of area not a one dimensional measurement of length. The two are incompatible - so you cannot have any square metres in a length.