Yes. Every solid will have all three of those "dimensions". They may not be easy to measure, but they're there.
You call it a geometric shape that is unknown to call a triangle which also affects the square because the square is not an illegal polygon, which will then lead to a Circle or a sphere as you may say it. Next it would've turned in to a rhombus with a square base. www.geometricsystems.com/shapes
They can be in some contexts, but not in others.
The answer, which may not even exist, depends on the inequality. There is, for example, no greatest solution for x > 5.
A "quadralateral" may be defined as a typographic error for the word "quadrilateral".
true
The statement is false.
Describing a geometric solid with only two dimensions may not provide a complete representation of its shape and structure. A geometric solid is best described in three dimensions to convey its full volume, surface area, and shape.
Your question is unclear. You may be referring to the arrangement in a crystal
the solids which have greater melting point may exist as solid layer
The word sought may be the genus Pyramidae, which are sea snails.The name derives from the geometric solid, the pyramid.
true
true
states
Yes. Every solid will have all three of those "dimensions". They may not be easy to measure, but they're there.
Residual metals may exist in solid waste--so yes.
I may be the upper or lower half of any oblate or prolate spheroid.You'll never know.bwahahaha