reduced form
$ara ;)
To form the next term: --- triple the previous term --- and subtract three
if you subtract each product from the next larger product you will end up with a wrong answer
9.565565556 = 9565565556/1000000000 = 2391391389/250000000 So it is rational. However, if you mean 9.565565556... where it continues with one more 5 than last time followed by a 6 and so on forever, then no, it is not a rational. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The decimal form of a rational number either terminates or continues with the same one or more digits repeating, eg 1.5, 1.333..., 1.1818181..., 1.1666..., 1.1565656... are all rational numbers. If the decimal does not terminate nor continue forever with the same repeating digit(s) then the number is irrational. 9.565565556 as written terminates and so it a rational number. 9.565565556... does not terminate nor does it continue with the same repeating digits (as an extra 5 is inserted before the next 6), so it it irrational.
First round 25.65 to 26 and then subtract it from 100, the difference being 74. Next add 0.35, the difference between 25.65 and 27, to 74. That sum, 74.35, is the answer to the question.
365 would be next because you multiply the last number by three then subtract one.
To solve rational expressions, first, factor both the numerator and the denominator whenever possible. Next, identify any common factors that can be canceled out to simplify the expression. If the expression includes an equation, set the simplified form equal to zero to find the variable's value, and ensure to check for any excluded values that make the denominator zero. Finally, express the solution in its simplest form.
To solve problems involving rational algebraic expressions, first, identify any restrictions by determining values that make the denominator zero. Next, simplify the expression by factoring and reducing common factors. If the problem involves equations, cross-multiply to eliminate the fractions, then solve for the variable. Finally, check your solutions against the restrictions to ensure they are valid.
Being rational or irrational is not about "predicting the next digit"; the definition of a rational number is that you can write it as a fraction, with integer numerator and denominator.Being rational or irrational is not about "predicting the next digit"; the definition of a rational number is that you can write it as a fraction, with integer numerator and denominator.Being rational or irrational is not about "predicting the next digit"; the definition of a rational number is that you can write it as a fraction, with integer numerator and denominator.Being rational or irrational is not about "predicting the next digit"; the definition of a rational number is that you can write it as a fraction, with integer numerator and denominator.
Next to any rational number is an irrational number, but next to an irrational number can be either a rational number or an irrational number, but it is infinitely more likely to be an irrational number (as between any two rational numbers are an infinity of irrational numbers).
To form the next term: --- triple the previous term --- and subtract three
You first need to find a common denominator, not necessarily the least common denominator. Next, you rename the fractions according to the common denominator. Only then can you subtract the fractions. After subtraction you should simplify the answer.
-11 Pattern: Subtract 1, subtract 2, subtract 3 and so on.
if you subtract each product from the next larger product you will end up with a wrong answer
Yes, 0.123 is a rational number because it can be expressed in the form of p/q where p and q are integers and q is not equal to zero. 0.123 can be written as 123/1000(123 and 1000 are integers and the denominator is not equal to zero).
Yes. Its rational because you know what number is going to come next. If the numbers were in a random order it would be irrational.
IT looks like the operations is "add 4 subtract 3, add 5 subtract 2, add 6...". So the next step would be to subtract one. That would make the next number 11.
The pattern appears to be: subtract 6, add 17, subtract 14, add 9, subtract 7. Following this pattern, the next number should be obtained by adding 3 to the last number in the sequence, which is 6. Therefore, the next number in the sequence is 9.