IT looks like the operations is "add 4 subtract 3, add 5 subtract 2, add 6...". So the next step would be to subtract one. That would make the next number 11.
Any arithmetic operation, other than division by zero, can be performed on any set of numbers in a sequence.
An arithmetic sequence is a series of numbers in which each term is obtained by adding a constant value, called the common difference, to the previous term. In contrast, a geometric sequence is formed by multiplying the previous term by a constant value, known as the common ratio. For example, in the arithmetic sequence 2, 5, 8, 11, the common difference is 3, while in the geometric sequence 3, 6, 12, 24, the common ratio is 2. Thus, the primary difference lies in how each term is generated: through addition for arithmetic and multiplication for geometric sequences.
In order to determine whether or not this is an arithmetic sequence, there must be at least 3 numbers.
The sequence of (3n) represents a series of numbers generated by multiplying the integer (n) by 3. Specifically, for (n = 0, 1, 2, 3, \ldots), the sequence is (0, 3, 6, 9, 12, \ldots). This is an arithmetic sequence where each term increases by 3, starting from 0. The general term can be expressed as (3n) for (n = 0, 1, 2, \ldots).
Put n = 1, 2, 3, 4 etc in the expression 5n + 2 and evaluate to get the sequence.
It is -148.
It is the start of an arithmetic sequence.
No it is not.U(2) - U(1) = 6 - 2 = 4U(3) - U(2) = 18 - 6 = 12Since 4 is different from 12, it is not an arithmetic sequence.
No, geometric, common ratio 2
One of the simplest arithmetic arithmetic sequence is the counting numbers: 1, 2, 3, ... . The person who discovered that is prehistoric and, therefore, unknown.
no, d = none
Any arithmetic operation, other than division by zero, can be performed on any set of numbers in a sequence.
The sequence 2, 3, 5, 8, 12 is neither arithmetic nor geometric. In an arithmetic sequence, the difference between consecutive terms is constant, while in a geometric sequence, the ratio between consecutive terms is constant. In this sequence, there is no constant difference or ratio between consecutive terms, so it does not fit the criteria for either type of sequence.
In order to determine whether or not this is an arithmetic sequence, there must be at least 3 numbers.
No, it is not.
It is arithmetic because it is going up by adding 2 to each number.
The sequence of (3n) represents a series of numbers generated by multiplying the integer (n) by 3. Specifically, for (n = 0, 1, 2, 3, \ldots), the sequence is (0, 3, 6, 9, 12, \ldots). This is an arithmetic sequence where each term increases by 3, starting from 0. The general term can be expressed as (3n) for (n = 0, 1, 2, \ldots).