No trapezoids are parallelograms, and no parallelograms are trapezoids.
never
Quadrangles that are not parallelograms = trapezoids, kites, any other polygon that is not a parallelogram
There is disagreement among authors on this. It depends on your definition of a trapezoid. A parallelogram is defined as a quadrilateral with opposite sides parallel. A trapezoid is defined as either- a quadrilateral with at least one pair of parallel sides, or- a quadrilateral with exactly one pair of parallel sides.Therefore, if you go with the former definition, yes all parallelograms are trapezoids, because all parallelograms have at least one pair of parallel sides. If you use the latter definition, no.The "at least one" definition is consistent with the trapezoid's uses in higher math, such as the trapezoidal rule for approximating integrals.You can say, however, that all trapezoids are not parallelograms.
yes * * * * * Never. A parallelogram has two pairs of equal angles opposite one another. A trapezoid does not.
No trapezoids are parallelograms, and no parallelograms are trapezoids.
No trapezoids are parallelograms, and no parallelograms are trapezoids.
No trapezoids are parallelograms, and no parallelograms are trapezoids.
No trapezoids are parallelograms, and no parallelograms are trapezoids.
No. Parallelograms are never trapezoids. Trapezoids are never parallelograms.
No trapezoids are not parallelograms. Trapezoids are actually quadrilaterals and they have one pair of opposite sides. Parallelograms by definition have 2 pairs of parallel sides.
parallelograms have two sets of parallel lines trapezoids do not
Yes.
No. Trapezoids are not parallelograms at all.
No but all parallelograms are trapezoids
No, but all parallelograms are trapezoids.
no