Just to be awkward, I rather think it should be 3 months' time. Months are not in possession of time !!!!
I believe it would be "3 months time". Answer above is correct in that months cannot be in possession of time; however, "3 months' time" would still be giving the word "months" possession.
3 quarters. There are 12 months in a year a quarter of a year is 3 months, 3 quarters is 9 months.
3 months/1 year = 3 months/12 months = 3/12 which can be simplified to 1/4.
There are 42 months in 3 1/2 years. months in 3 years = 3 x 12 = 36 months in half a year = 6 therefore months in 3 and a half years = 36+6 = 42 months
3 years = 12*3 months = 36 months. 1 trimester = 3 months so 36 months = 36/3 = 12 trimesters.
3 years and 10 months....I agreed with Brijesh Sharma.
No
You have been here for four months.
Esperanto is an artificial language. It works because its grammar is easy and the verbs are all regular. You can learn it within 3 months.
3 months
Taking the information contained in the question and doing the math - it sounds like a total of 9 months backup time. If the PO recommended that 3 months of that run concurrently - then that would mean the jail time would be only 6 months.
1. type(0) Unrestricted Grammar 2. type(1) Context Sensitive Grammar 3 type(2) Context Free Grammar 4. type(3) Regular Grammar
3 months
the proper grammar is the time has come
Now when it is 3:00 a.m. during daylight savings months (spring to autumn) in New York, the time during standard time months in Wellington, New Zealand, is 7:00 p.m. the same day. When it is 3:00 a.m. during daylight savings months in New York, the time during daylight savings time months (late September to early April) in Wellington is 8:00 p.m. When it is 3:00 a.m. during standard time months in New York, the time during daylight savings time months in Wellington is 9:00 p.m.
3 years 5 months...?
3 MONTHS
Made it exactly at their cut off time is not a correct grammar.