An explicit rule defines the terms of a sequence in terms of some independent parameter. A recursive rule defines them in relation to values of the variable at some earlier stage(s) in the sequence.
Yes. Each term is 10 more than the previous term.
Oh honey, that pattern is as recursive as a broken record playing the same old tune. Each number just adds another 1 to the end, like a never-ending saga of ones. So yeah, it's recursive alright, just like that annoying jingle that gets stuck in your head for days.
No. Grapes have nothing to do with a recursive series of numbers following the rule that any number is the sum of the previous two.
no it is not recursive
A recursive pattern is a pattern that goes like this 2,4,6,8 and on. A pattern rule which is used to find the next term.
A recursive rule is one which can be applied over and over again to its own output
Recursive refers to using a rule or procedure that can be applied repeatedly.
circle pattern
no it is not a recursive pattern because it isn't equal numbers.
An explicit rule defines the terms of a sequence in terms of some independent parameter. A recursive rule defines them in relation to values of the variable at some earlier stage(s) in the sequence.
Yes. The next two numbers would be 49 & 58. This is because, from the first number, the pattern repeats by adding 10 then 9. So - 39+19 is 49, and 49+9=58.
No, patterns with terms that are not based upon previous terms are not recursive. Example: i * i where i is the nth term of the pattern.
You can search on ebay or more likey to find at Staples :)
Each number is -4 times the previous one. That means that you can write a recursive rule as: f(1) = -3 f(n) = -4 * f(n-1) The explicit rule involves powers of -4; you can write it as: f(n) = -3 * (-4)^(n-1)
Each number is -4 times the previous one. That means that you can write a recursive rule as: f(1) = -3 f(n) = -4 * f(n-1) The explicit rule involves powers of -4; you can write it as: f(n) = -3 * (-4)^(n-1)
5509.