Because if you have one apple and then take another and put it with that one apple you would then have two apples. Therefore 1 + 1 = 2 ANSWER 2- Well you could test it by going 2 - 1 = 1, but somethings in math you just have to go along with, it just works ANSWER NUMBER 3: Russell's & Whitehead's proof uses pure symbolic logic. It's pretty arcane, though, because first you have to come to a definition of what "1" means, what "2" means, and even what "+" & "=" means! It's a lot harder than you think without using circular definitions (eg "1" is when there is only one of something - this won't do as a definition).
The proof goes something like this (remember, it depends on set theory):
We start off by defining the natural numbers (ie positive integers) in terms of sets.
For any set S, define a "successor" function f as
f(S) = {S, {S}}
ie, the set containing: S and the set containing S.
Then we define the natural integers as such:
Define the number 0 to be the empty set, which I'll write here as O.
Then each successive integer (ie "n+1") is just the preceding integer put through the successor function, ie
1 = {O, {O}}
2 = {O, {O, {O
3 = {O, {O, {O, {O}
and so on.
Then 1+1=f(1)={O, {O, {O=2. QED.
By the way, from this definition of natural integers we can work out the entire system of arithmetic, including rational numbers, irrational & transcendental numbers, multiplication, division etc...
Chat with our AI personalities
2 or two is the answer.
two fourths equals one half two eighths equals one quarter one half plus one quarter is three quarters. Or, two fourths equals four eighths four eighths plus two eighths equals six eighths six eighths equals three quarters.
Its equals 3
No it does not, one plus one equals two.
one forth is equal to two eighths. therefore two eighths plus one eighth equals three eighths