Answers: (1) It is not, 0.9 repeating is an infinitesimal, it will get infinitely close to 1 but never reach it.
(2) You sir, are incorrect. What is 1 divided by 3? 0.3 repeating. What is 0.3 repeating times 3? 0.9 repeating. So how can you say they are any different?
(3) The first 2 answerers have illustrated a classic philosophy puzzle. According to Zeno's dichotomy paradox (see link below), when moving to Point A to Point B, before you get there you must move halfway to Point B, then half of the remaining distance, and half of the now remaining distanceand so on. The paradox is that by this logic you will never get to point B, but we see in the real world that you do in fact reach point B.
Thus, answer (1) above is the literal logical interpretation of strict truth of computer programming, in which such exactitude is both possible and necessary. Answer (2) is the practical interpretation as is applicable in our daily lives, in which humans cannot visualize infinite decimal places(or infinitely smaller distances) and so we round numbers up or down to a more graspable number of decimal places.
Both are correct. It is also possible that both are merely being purposely obtuse for the sake of argument. (4) If two numbers are not equal, there exists another number between them. (e.g. 1 and 2 have 1.5 between them, 1.0001 and 1.0002 have 1.00015 between them) What number is between 0.999... and 1? There isn't one, so 0.999... = 1. (5) Subtract 1 - 0.999 = 0.000... = 0. No, the answer isn't 0.000...1 because that number doesn't exist. You can't have an infinite series of 0s that ends with a 1. The infinite series of 0s doesn't end, so there is no last digit to put the 1. (6) If you don't like the subtraction in (5), try it this way:
0.999... * 10 = 9.999...
Subtract 0.999... from both sides:
0.999... * 10 - 0.999... = 9.999... - 0.999...
Simplify the left side: 0.999... * 9 = 9.999... - 0.999...
Simplify the right side: 0.999... * 9 = 9
Divide both sides by 9: 0.999... = 1
(6) Why shouldn't they be equal? There are many ways to write the same number.
1 = 1/1 = 5/5 = 1.0 = 1.000... = 0.999...
(7) "0.9 repeating is an infinitesimal", erm, how can 0.999... be infinitely small? There are lots of number that is smaller than that, such as 0.5. Also, "it will get infinitely close to 1 but never reach it." is wrong. 0.999... is a number, it has an exact value and doesn't approach another number.
1.083r (r denotes repeating) = 100*1.083r = 108.3r %
percent for 0.3 repeating = 33.33%0.3333 * 100% = 33.33%
*The trick with .1 repeating is it always will be divided by 9. 11.1 = 100/9
67/100 i think :)
Write the repeating digits over the same number of 9s and simplify: 0.81... has two repeating digits ⇒ the denominator has two 9s, ie 99. ⇒ 0.81... = 81/99 = 9/11
.0999/100
0999
.0999 rounded to the nearest tenth is .1
The square root of 100 is 10, which is rational. If you must have it in the form of a repeating decimal, you can try either 10.0... or 9.99... which, mathematically, is the same.
Well, honey, 1.3 repeating is the same as 1.333... in decimal form. To convert that to a percentage, you just multiply by 100. So, 1.3 repeating as a percentage is 133.3%. Hope that clears things up for you, sweetheart.
Reduce the fraction. By my experience most will be repeating if the denominator is not 2,4,5,8, or 10 or.... MULTIPLE OF 10 and these same ones ..... like 20,40 etc., or a multiple of 100 and these same ones, etc
1.083r (r denotes repeating) = 100*1.083r = 108.3r %
0.916 repeating as a percent = 91.67%0.916666 * 100% = 91.67%
1 = x 44 100 Cross-multiply and you get 100 = 44x 100 / 44 = x 100 / 44 = 2.27 repeating So the answer is 2.27 (repeating). :)
Not really, 10² = 100
percent for 0.3 repeating = 33.33%0.3333 * 100% = 33.33%
Divide 100 by 3