answersLogoWhite

0

It is not 104 - (-63) = 167 as one might assume but 166. This is because, unlike what would happen on the number line, there was no year 0.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

ViviVivi
Your ride-or-die bestie who's seen you through every high and low.
Chat with Vivi
JudyJudy
Simplicity is my specialty.
Chat with Judy
SteveSteve
Knowledge is a journey, you know? We'll get there.
Chat with Steve
More answers

600

User Avatar

Charlie Paul

Lvl 2
1y ago
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How many years passed between 63 BC and 104 AD?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp