Graham's number (see below)
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Graham's number is so large that it needs a special notation to express:
>
> 3################################################################3
>
>where:
>
>3#3 = 3**3 = 27
>3##3 = 3#(3#3) = 3#27 = 7,625,597,484,987
>3###3= 3##(3##3) = 3##7,625,597,484,987
>=3#(7,625,597,484,987#7,625,597,484,987)
> (this expression is too large to express as a number)
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Why not introduce a form of standardisation for naming larger numbers than
those you mentioned by defining a conventional notation using the 'plex' from
'googolplex', for example:
skewplex = 10**skew
Grahamplex = 10**Graham
skewplexplex = skewplex**skewplex
skewplexplexplex = skewplex**skewplexplex ( = skewplex**(skewplex**skewplex) )
Grahamplexplex = Grahamplex**Grahamplex = 1 Gerard
Gerardplexplex = Gerardplex**Gerardplex = 1 Gerald
Geraldplexplex = Geraldplex**Geraldplex = 1 Geoffrey
etc. through proper names (alphabetical order would probably be more sensible),
thus systematically assigning names to the natural numbers as suggested.
Chat with our AI personalities