answersLogoWhite

0

Graham's number (see below)

>-------------------------------------------------------------------------

>

>Graham's number is so large that it needs a special notation to express:

>

> 3################################################################3

>

>where:

>

>3#3 = 3**3 = 27

>3##3 = 3#(3#3) = 3#27 = 7,625,597,484,987

>3###3= 3##(3##3) = 3##7,625,597,484,987

>=3#(7,625,597,484,987#7,625,597,484,987)

> (this expression is too large to express as a number)

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Why not introduce a form of standardisation for naming larger numbers than

those you mentioned by defining a conventional notation using the 'plex' from

'googolplex', for example:

skewplex = 10**skew

Grahamplex = 10**Graham

skewplexplex = skewplex**skewplex

skewplexplexplex = skewplex**skewplexplex ( = skewplex**(skewplex**skewplex) )

Grahamplexplex = Grahamplex**Grahamplex = 1 Gerard

Gerardplexplex = Gerardplex**Gerardplex = 1 Gerald

Geraldplexplex = Geraldplex**Geraldplex = 1 Geoffrey

etc. through proper names (alphabetical order would probably be more sensible),

thus systematically assigning names to the natural numbers as suggested.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

What else can I help you with?