This statement is not always true. While it is true that if a number is divisible by 4, it is also divisible by 2, the reverse is not necessarily true. For example, the number 6 is divisible by 2 but not by 4. In general, being divisible by 2 is a necessary but not a sufficient condition for being divisible by 4.
Chat with our AI personalities
Oh, dude, that's not quite right. If a number is divisible by 2, it means it's even, but it doesn't necessarily mean it's divisible by 4. Like, 6 is divisible by 2 but not by 4. So, yeah, being divisible by 2 doesn't automatically mean it's divisible by 4.
That is not necessarily the case. 6 is divisible by 2, but not by 4.
Actually, if the last two digits can be divisible by 4 then the whole number is divisible by 4. Hi! But if a number is divisible by four then it is divisible by 2. But not the other way around.
Not always for example, 36 is not divisible by 8 but it is divisible by 2 and 4.
blank = 2 is a possible answer.
612 is divisible by 4. To test divisibility by 4, if the last 2 digits of the number are divisible by 4, then the whole number is divisible by 4. Last 2 digits of 612 are 12, and 12 is divisible by 4 since 3x4 = 12, so 612 is divisible by 4. 612 / 4 = 153.
NO, can 2 be divided by 6........ yes, can 4 be divided by 6......... Every number is divisible by every other number, but not always exactly. Not every number that is exactly divisible by 2 is exactly divisble by 4. Examples: 2, 18, 30, 46
yes.. always..