No.
No. You should add up all the digits, and if the sum isn't divisible by 3, then the whole number isn't divisible by 3.
It is divisible by 3, for example.It is divisible by 3, for example.It is divisible by 3, for example.It is divisible by 3, for example.
1003
A number is divisible by 3 if the sum of its digits is divisible by 3.
334.3333 times.
No. You should add up all the digits, and if the sum isn't divisible by 3, then the whole number isn't divisible by 3.
1, 17, 59, 1003.
The number 1003 is not in the 3 times table because it is not evenly divisible by 3. When you divide 1003 by 3, you get a quotient of 334 with a remainder of 1, indicating that it cannot be expressed as 3 multiplied by an integer. Therefore, 1003 does not fit the pattern of numbers in the 3 times table.
501.5
Yes. 25075/25 = 1003.
Yes. It is divisible by 17 and 59.
No, all multiples of three can be worked out easily. The sum of all the numbers must add up to 3, 6 or 9. For example, 1+0+0+3 = 4 so it is not a multiple of 3. Another example is 876. 8+7+6=21 2+1=3 so 876 is a multiple of 3.
2,006 is divisible by: 1, 2, 17, 34, 59, 118, 1003, 2006.
No.
No, it is divisible by 3.No, it is divisible by 3.No, it is divisible by 3.No, it is divisible by 3.
It is divisible by 3, for example.It is divisible by 3, for example.It is divisible by 3, for example.It is divisible by 3, for example.
1003